OBJECTIVE: The Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases of Sapienza University of Rome conducted a critical appraisal of Regional Prevention Plans (RPPs) 2010-2012 aimed at exploring different quality elements of the RPPs, including the coherence with the epidemiological context and with regional health planning, the degree of attention to specific public health issues, the adherence to the principles of Project Cycle Management (PCM) and Evidence-Based Prevention (EBP), as well as at analyzing possible determinants of the quality of RPPs, such as the influence of Recovery Plans. METHODS: A grid analysis evidence-based was use to conduct, for the two RPPs areas (i.e. strategic and operative planning): 1. the descriptive analysis of RPPs; 2. the analysis of the projects included in RPPs. RESULTS: The analysis showed some strengths and weaknesses in the prevention planning process, including a low adherence to the principles of EBP and a low degree of attention towards the reduction of health inequalities. Furthermore, projects developed by Regions with recovery plans showed a lower quality. CONCLUSIONS: The role of the University in the ongoing evaluation of the planning process, but also in monitoring the health status of the population, with particular attention to regional differences, can be crucial to support regional capacity building in prevention planning.

The planning of prevention in Italy: the perspective of the university. [La programmazione della prevenzione in Italia: la prospettiva dell'università]

VILLARI, Paolo;ROSSO, ANNALISA;
2014

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases of Sapienza University of Rome conducted a critical appraisal of Regional Prevention Plans (RPPs) 2010-2012 aimed at exploring different quality elements of the RPPs, including the coherence with the epidemiological context and with regional health planning, the degree of attention to specific public health issues, the adherence to the principles of Project Cycle Management (PCM) and Evidence-Based Prevention (EBP), as well as at analyzing possible determinants of the quality of RPPs, such as the influence of Recovery Plans. METHODS: A grid analysis evidence-based was use to conduct, for the two RPPs areas (i.e. strategic and operative planning): 1. the descriptive analysis of RPPs; 2. the analysis of the projects included in RPPs. RESULTS: The analysis showed some strengths and weaknesses in the prevention planning process, including a low adherence to the principles of EBP and a low degree of attention towards the reduction of health inequalities. Furthermore, projects developed by Regions with recovery plans showed a lower quality. CONCLUSIONS: The role of the University in the ongoing evaluation of the planning process, but also in monitoring the health status of the population, with particular attention to regional differences, can be crucial to support regional capacity building in prevention planning.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2522357
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact