WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: Patients undergoing thoracic surgery are at high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The feasibility of using point of care ultrasound to diagnose diaphragmatic dysfunction is unclear. WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: Point of care ultrasound can be used to detect diaphragmatic dysfunction after thoracic surgeryDiaphragmatic dysfunction may be associated with postoperative pulmonary complications BACKGROUND: Postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction after thoracic surgery is underestimated due to the lack of reproducible bedside diagnostic methods. We used point of care ultrasound to assess diaphragmatic function bedside in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic or thoracotomic lung resection. Our main hypothesis was that the thoracoscopic approach may be associated with lower incidence of postoperative diaphragm dysfunction as compared to thoracotomy. Furthermore, we assessed the association between postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction and postoperative pulmonary complications. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study. Two cohorts of patients were evaluated: those undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus those undergoing thoracotomy. Diaphragmatic dysfunction was defined as a diaphragmatic excursion less than 10 mm. The ultrasound evaluations were carried out before (preoperative) and after (i.e., 2 h and 24 h postoperatively) surgery. The occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications was assessed up to 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: Among the 75 patients enrolled, the incidence of postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction at 24 h was higher in the thoracotomy group as compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (29 of 35, 83% vs. 22 of 40, 55%, respectively; odds ratio = 3.95 [95% CI, 1.5 to 10.3]; P = 0.005). Patients with diaphragmatic dysfunction on the first day after surgery had higher percentage of postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio = 5.5 [95% CI, 1.9 to 16.3]; P = 0.001). Radiologically assessed atelectasis was 46% (16 of 35) in the thoracotomy group versus 13% (5 of 40) in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (P = 0.040). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction as a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio = 5.5 [95% CI, 1.9 to 16.3]; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Point of care ultrasound can be used to evaluate postoperative diaphragmatic function. On the first postoperative day, diaphragmatic dysfunction was less common after video-assisted than after the thoracotomic surgery and is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications.

Point of Care Ultrasound to Identify Diaphragmatic Dysfunction after Thoracic Surgery

Spadaro S
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Fogagnolo A
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Dalla Corte F
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Tamburini N
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Maniscalco P
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Cavallesco G
Writing – Review & Editing
;
DE CAMILLIS, ENRICO;Ragazzi R
Penultimo
;
Volta CA.
Ultimo
2019

Abstract

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: Patients undergoing thoracic surgery are at high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The feasibility of using point of care ultrasound to diagnose diaphragmatic dysfunction is unclear. WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: Point of care ultrasound can be used to detect diaphragmatic dysfunction after thoracic surgeryDiaphragmatic dysfunction may be associated with postoperative pulmonary complications BACKGROUND: Postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction after thoracic surgery is underestimated due to the lack of reproducible bedside diagnostic methods. We used point of care ultrasound to assess diaphragmatic function bedside in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic or thoracotomic lung resection. Our main hypothesis was that the thoracoscopic approach may be associated with lower incidence of postoperative diaphragm dysfunction as compared to thoracotomy. Furthermore, we assessed the association between postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction and postoperative pulmonary complications. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study. Two cohorts of patients were evaluated: those undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus those undergoing thoracotomy. Diaphragmatic dysfunction was defined as a diaphragmatic excursion less than 10 mm. The ultrasound evaluations were carried out before (preoperative) and after (i.e., 2 h and 24 h postoperatively) surgery. The occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications was assessed up to 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: Among the 75 patients enrolled, the incidence of postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction at 24 h was higher in the thoracotomy group as compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (29 of 35, 83% vs. 22 of 40, 55%, respectively; odds ratio = 3.95 [95% CI, 1.5 to 10.3]; P = 0.005). Patients with diaphragmatic dysfunction on the first day after surgery had higher percentage of postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio = 5.5 [95% CI, 1.9 to 16.3]; P = 0.001). Radiologically assessed atelectasis was 46% (16 of 35) in the thoracotomy group versus 13% (5 of 40) in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (P = 0.040). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction as a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio = 5.5 [95% CI, 1.9 to 16.3]; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Point of care ultrasound can be used to evaluate postoperative diaphragmatic function. On the first postoperative day, diaphragmatic dysfunction was less common after video-assisted than after the thoracotomic surgery and is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications.
2019
Spadaro, S; Grasso, S; Dres, M; Fogagnolo, A; Dalla Corte, F; Tamburini, N; Maniscalco, P; Cavallesco, G; Alvisi, V; Stripoli, T; DE CAMILLIS, Enrico;...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Spadaro S anesthesiology 2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 601 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
601 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2406950
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 17
  • Scopus 47
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 45
social impact