Since some pioneering studies published during the late eighties, an increasing amount of research has addressed issues related to the economic and financial valuation of buildings' energy retrofitting transactions over the span of the last two decades. Nevertheless, conflicting results emerge: some actions turn out to be feasible, while others do not, depending on several variables such as investment costs, energy supply costs and energy price trend. Moreover, the supposed price premium for green buildings is still unclear and ambiguous. According to the economic theory, a way to assume decisions related to feasibility issues relies on the comparison between marginal costs and benefits. A couple of recent studies discussed about marginal costs and benefits in building energy retrofitting transactions, arguing that mar-ginal costs are found to be steeply increasing with raising the thermal standards of buildings. Nonetheless, due to the paucity of systematic studies and consistent data, the topic deserves further investigations. This essay aims to expose and discuss results obtained in a research conducted on public housing settlements. Analysing several hypotheses of energy retrofits, marginal costs are found to assume a near-parabolic shape: it is, firstly, mildly decreasing and then sharply increasing. Moreover, marginal costs are compared with marginal benefits, in order to highlight feasible intervention options.

Marginal costs and benefits in building energy retrofitting transaction

GABRIELLI, Laura;
2016

Abstract

Since some pioneering studies published during the late eighties, an increasing amount of research has addressed issues related to the economic and financial valuation of buildings' energy retrofitting transactions over the span of the last two decades. Nevertheless, conflicting results emerge: some actions turn out to be feasible, while others do not, depending on several variables such as investment costs, energy supply costs and energy price trend. Moreover, the supposed price premium for green buildings is still unclear and ambiguous. According to the economic theory, a way to assume decisions related to feasibility issues relies on the comparison between marginal costs and benefits. A couple of recent studies discussed about marginal costs and benefits in building energy retrofitting transactions, arguing that mar-ginal costs are found to be steeply increasing with raising the thermal standards of buildings. Nonetheless, due to the paucity of systematic studies and consistent data, the topic deserves further investigations. This essay aims to expose and discuss results obtained in a research conducted on public housing settlements. Analysing several hypotheses of energy retrofits, marginal costs are found to assume a near-parabolic shape: it is, firstly, mildly decreasing and then sharply increasing. Moreover, marginal costs are compared with marginal benefits, in order to highlight feasible intervention options.
2016
978-3-00-052213-0
Building energy-efficiency; marginal cost; Life cycle costing; Cost-optimum approach.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SBE16Hamburg_ConferenceProceedings (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 940.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
940.08 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
2016_b_SBE.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 906.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
906.47 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2370001
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact