Student activity noise is the dominant sound source in primary school classrooms. While it reflects the dynamic and interactive nature of learning, excessive noise can disrupt speech perception, impair concentration, and affect well-being. This study analysed the acoustic environment of 26 classrooms during real lessons, separating speech and activity noise using Gaussian Mixture Models. Ninety-three periods of homogeneous activities across Grades II–V were examined to assess the effects of activity type, student age, and classroom acoustic characteristics. Results indicated that the type of activity in the class is an important source of acoustic variability, with teacher-led lessons and group work producing the highest overall levels and quiet work the lowest. Activity noise averaged 50 dB(A) across activities, with large variability linked to class-specific behavioural dynamics, and speech levels were consistently higher in more interactive settings. Student age significantly affected speech levels, showing a nearly 5 dB decline from Grade II to Grade V, and, together with activity type, influenced the speech–noise relationship. Noise level analyses revealed a 10 dB increase from unoccupied to baseline conditions (occupied but inactive) and an additional rise of over 5 dB during activities. Classrooms with higher speech clarity had lower activity noise, highlighting the role of early reflections control in mitigating noise from student movement and interaction. The findings underscore the importance of integrating acoustic ergonomics into school design and refurbishment, through multidisciplinary collaboration, to support effective communication and learning—particularly for younger children.

Let's get loud: How classroom activities influence speech and noise levels during lessons

Visentin, Chiara
Primo
;
Prodi, Nicola
Ultimo
2026

Abstract

Student activity noise is the dominant sound source in primary school classrooms. While it reflects the dynamic and interactive nature of learning, excessive noise can disrupt speech perception, impair concentration, and affect well-being. This study analysed the acoustic environment of 26 classrooms during real lessons, separating speech and activity noise using Gaussian Mixture Models. Ninety-three periods of homogeneous activities across Grades II–V were examined to assess the effects of activity type, student age, and classroom acoustic characteristics. Results indicated that the type of activity in the class is an important source of acoustic variability, with teacher-led lessons and group work producing the highest overall levels and quiet work the lowest. Activity noise averaged 50 dB(A) across activities, with large variability linked to class-specific behavioural dynamics, and speech levels were consistently higher in more interactive settings. Student age significantly affected speech levels, showing a nearly 5 dB decline from Grade II to Grade V, and, together with activity type, influenced the speech–noise relationship. Noise level analyses revealed a 10 dB increase from unoccupied to baseline conditions (occupied but inactive) and an additional rise of over 5 dB during activities. Classrooms with higher speech clarity had lower activity noise, highlighting the role of early reflections control in mitigating noise from student movement and interaction. The findings underscore the importance of integrating acoustic ergonomics into school design and refurbishment, through multidisciplinary collaboration, to support effective communication and learning—particularly for younger children.
2026
Visentin, Chiara; Prodi, Nicola
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Visentin_BAE_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.19 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.19 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2611277
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact