Background: There is limited evidence on the safety and efficacy of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting ultra-thin stent (BP-SES) in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aims: This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of HBR patients treated with BP-SES and ≤ 30-day dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant studies involving HBR patients who underwent PCI with BP-SES (Supraflex Cruz). Individual patient-level data were extracted from the included studies. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 1-year. The safety endpoint was the 1-year occurrence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3−5. Results: The study population included 1691 patients. Of these, 928 patients (55%) received a ≤ 30-day DAPT, while 763 patients (45%) received a longer DAPT regimen. In the ≤ 30-day DAPT group, primary outcome events occurred in 89 patients (9.5%, 95% CI: 7.7%−11.6%). The upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI of 11.6% was below the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 14%. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint between the ≤ 30-day DAPT group and the >30-day DAPT group (propensity score adjusted HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.67−3). Notably, the incidence of BARC 3−5 bleeding events was significantly lower in the ≤ 30-day DAPT group. Conclusions: In HBR patients treated with BP-SES, a ≤ 30-day DAPT regimen is associated with a low rate of ischemic events and a significant reduction in major bleeding events. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024524208.

30-Day DAPT in Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing PCI With Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Ultra-Thin Stent

Erriquez, Andrea;Pavasini, Rita;Casella, Gianni;Biscaglia, Simone;Campo, Gianluca
;
2025

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence on the safety and efficacy of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting ultra-thin stent (BP-SES) in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aims: This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of HBR patients treated with BP-SES and ≤ 30-day dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant studies involving HBR patients who underwent PCI with BP-SES (Supraflex Cruz). Individual patient-level data were extracted from the included studies. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 1-year. The safety endpoint was the 1-year occurrence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3−5. Results: The study population included 1691 patients. Of these, 928 patients (55%) received a ≤ 30-day DAPT, while 763 patients (45%) received a longer DAPT regimen. In the ≤ 30-day DAPT group, primary outcome events occurred in 89 patients (9.5%, 95% CI: 7.7%−11.6%). The upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI of 11.6% was below the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 14%. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint between the ≤ 30-day DAPT group and the >30-day DAPT group (propensity score adjusted HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.67−3). Notably, the incidence of BARC 3−5 bleeding events was significantly lower in the ≤ 30-day DAPT group. Conclusions: In HBR patients treated with BP-SES, a ≤ 30-day DAPT regimen is associated with a low rate of ischemic events and a significant reduction in major bleeding events. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024524208.
2025
Erriquez, Andrea; Leistner, David M; Paradies, Valeria; Pavasini, Rita; Serenelli, Matteo; Casella, Gianni; Biscaglia, Simone; Naber, Christoph; Campo...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2588546
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact