The «holy Aegisthus» (OF xxi, 57, 5): history and exegesis of an epithet · The aim of this paper is to reflect on the interpretation of the closing syntagma «sacro Egisto» (‘holy Aegisthus’) in the 21st canto of the Orlando Furioso (57, 5). A synoptic reading of the commentaries on Ariosto’s epic poem over the centuries allows us to problematise the current vulgate, which explains the attribute as a derogatory Latinism (meaning ‘sacrilegious’). Thanks to an analysis of the occurrences in the Furioso of the term sacro and the mythological character in other ancient literary sources, it is possible to reason about a different meaning, namely ‘priest’.
L’articolo intende riflettere sull’interpretazione dell’epiteto nella clausola «sacro Egisto» del xxi canto del Furioso (57, 5). Una lettura sinottica dei commenti al poema ariostesco lungo i secoli permette di problematizzare l’attuale vulgata, che spiega l’attributo come un latinismo dispregiativo (col significato di ‘sacrilego’). Grazie a un’analisi delle occorrenze del termine sacro e del personaggio mitologico in altre fonti letterarie antiche è possibile ragionare su un’accezione differente, cioè ‘sacerdote’.
«Il sacro Egisto» (OF XXI, 57, 5): storia ed esegesi di un epiteto
De Rosa, Riccardo
2023
Abstract
The «holy Aegisthus» (OF xxi, 57, 5): history and exegesis of an epithet · The aim of this paper is to reflect on the interpretation of the closing syntagma «sacro Egisto» (‘holy Aegisthus’) in the 21st canto of the Orlando Furioso (57, 5). A synoptic reading of the commentaries on Ariosto’s epic poem over the centuries allows us to problematise the current vulgate, which explains the attribute as a derogatory Latinism (meaning ‘sacrilegious’). Thanks to an analysis of the occurrences in the Furioso of the term sacro and the mythological character in other ancient literary sources, it is possible to reason about a different meaning, namely ‘priest’.I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


