The objective of this thesis is to present the relationship between Antonio Gramsci's (1891-1937) concept of hegemony and Ernesto Laclau's (1935-2014) concept of populism. This general objective and specific objectives will be developed based on the methodology of bibliographical research and the history of concepts (begriffsgeschichte). The thesis is divided into three parts. In the first part I’ll present the development of the concept of hegemony in Antonio Gramsci, using his articles in magazines, the Quaderni and commentators such as Guido Liguori and Carlos Nelson Coutinho. In the second chapter, I’ll develop the concept of populism in Laclau and how the concept of hegemony is received by the author. For this, I use five works: Politics and ideology in Marxist theory (1977); Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (written with Chantal Mouffe in 1985); New Reflections on the Revolution of our time (1989); Emancipations (1996) and On Populist Reason (2005). Finally, in the third chapter, I’ll present some specific questions regarding the relationship that I propose to demonstrate in the main objective. Problems related to the role of the leader, the concept of representation and criticism of the limits of the relationship between Gramsci and Laclau are the main points that articulate the final part of the thesis. Finally, I present the concept of “private apparatuses of hegemony” to compose the thesis as a possible point of articulation between the two theories. The final considerations consist of affirming the expansion of Laclau's populist ideas, but through Gramsci's socialist bias.

O objetivo desta tese é apresentar a relação entre o conceito de hegemonia de Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937) e o conceito de populismo em Ernesto Laclau (1935-2014). Esse objetivo geral e os objetivos específicos serão desenvolvidos desde a metodologia de pesquisa bibliográfica e da história dos conceitos (begriffsgeschichte) Para tanto, a tese é dividida em três partes. Na primeira parte apresento o desenvolvimento do conceito de hegemonia em Antonio Gramsci, utilizando seus artigos em revistas, os Quaderni e comentadores como Guido Liguori e Carlos Nelson Coutinho. No segundo capítulo, desenvolvo o conceito de populismo em Laclau e de que modo o conceito de hegemonia é recepcionado pelo autor. Para isso, utilizo cinco obras: Política e ideologia na teoria marxista (1977); Hegemonia e Estratégia Socialista (escrito com Chantal Mouffe em 1985); New Reflections on the Revolution of our time (1989); Emancipations (1996) e A Razão Populista (2005). Por fim, no terceiro capítulo, apresento algumas questões pontuais referentes à relação que proponho demonstrar no objetivo principal. Problemas relacionados ao papel do líder, do conceito de representação e de críticas aos limites da relação entre Gramsci e Laclau são os principais pontos que articulam a parte final da tese. Apresento, enfim, o conceito de “aparelhos privados de hegemonia” para compor a tese como um possível ponto de articulação entre as duas teorias. As considerações finais consistem na afirmação da ampliação das ideias populistas de Laclau, mas através do viés socialista de Gramsci.

O POPULISMO EM ERNESTO LACLAU: ENTRE DEMOCRACIA E HEGEMONIA

BATISTA, CAMILA
2024

Abstract

The objective of this thesis is to present the relationship between Antonio Gramsci's (1891-1937) concept of hegemony and Ernesto Laclau's (1935-2014) concept of populism. This general objective and specific objectives will be developed based on the methodology of bibliographical research and the history of concepts (begriffsgeschichte). The thesis is divided into three parts. In the first part I’ll present the development of the concept of hegemony in Antonio Gramsci, using his articles in magazines, the Quaderni and commentators such as Guido Liguori and Carlos Nelson Coutinho. In the second chapter, I’ll develop the concept of populism in Laclau and how the concept of hegemony is received by the author. For this, I use five works: Politics and ideology in Marxist theory (1977); Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (written with Chantal Mouffe in 1985); New Reflections on the Revolution of our time (1989); Emancipations (1996) and On Populist Reason (2005). Finally, in the third chapter, I’ll present some specific questions regarding the relationship that I propose to demonstrate in the main objective. Problems related to the role of the leader, the concept of representation and criticism of the limits of the relationship between Gramsci and Laclau are the main points that articulate the final part of the thesis. Finally, I present the concept of “private apparatuses of hegemony” to compose the thesis as a possible point of articulation between the two theories. The final considerations consist of affirming the expansion of Laclau's populist ideas, but through Gramsci's socialist bias.
D'ALFONSO, Matteo Vincenzo
PERETTO, Carlo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tese Camila Batista.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Tesi
Tipologia: Tesi di dottorato
Dimensione 962.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
962.53 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2545570
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact