COVID‐19 pandemic had a negative impact on the mental health and well‐being (WB) of citizens. This cross‐sectional study included 4 waves of data collection aimed at identifying profiles of individuals with different levels of WB. The study included a representative stratified sample of 10,013 respondents in Italy. The WHO 5-item well-being scale (WHO‐5) was used for the assessment of WB. Different supervised machine learning approaches (multinomial logistic regression, partial least‐ square discriminant analysis—PLS‐DA—, classification tree—CT—) were applied to identify individual characteristics with different WB scores, first in waves 1–2 and, subsequently, in waves 3 and 4. Forty‐ one percent of participants reported “Good WB”, 30% “Poor WB”, and 28% “Depression”. Findings carried out using multinomial logistic regression show that Resilience was the most important variable able for discriminating the WB across all waves. Through the PLS‐DA, Increased Unhealthy Behaviours proved to be the more important feature in the first two waves, while Financial Situation gained most relevance in the last two. COVID-19 Perceived Risk was relevant, but less than the other variables, across all waves. Interestingly, using the CT we were able to establish a cut‐off for Resilience (equal to 4.5) that discriminated good WB with a probability of 65% in wave 4. Concluding, we found that COVID‐19 had negative implications for WB. Governments should support evidence‐based strategies considering factors that influence WB (i.e., Resilience, Perceived Risk, Healthy Behaviours, and Financial Situation).

Psychological well‐being during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Italy assessed in a four‐waves survey

Marta Caserotti;Teresa Gavaruzzi;Alessandra Tasso;
2022

Abstract

COVID‐19 pandemic had a negative impact on the mental health and well‐being (WB) of citizens. This cross‐sectional study included 4 waves of data collection aimed at identifying profiles of individuals with different levels of WB. The study included a representative stratified sample of 10,013 respondents in Italy. The WHO 5-item well-being scale (WHO‐5) was used for the assessment of WB. Different supervised machine learning approaches (multinomial logistic regression, partial least‐ square discriminant analysis—PLS‐DA—, classification tree—CT—) were applied to identify individual characteristics with different WB scores, first in waves 1–2 and, subsequently, in waves 3 and 4. Forty‐ one percent of participants reported “Good WB”, 30% “Poor WB”, and 28% “Depression”. Findings carried out using multinomial logistic regression show that Resilience was the most important variable able for discriminating the WB across all waves. Through the PLS‐DA, Increased Unhealthy Behaviours proved to be the more important feature in the first two waves, while Financial Situation gained most relevance in the last two. COVID-19 Perceived Risk was relevant, but less than the other variables, across all waves. Interestingly, using the CT we were able to establish a cut‐off for Resilience (equal to 4.5) that discriminated good WB with a probability of 65% in wave 4. Concluding, we found that COVID‐19 had negative implications for WB. Governments should support evidence‐based strategies considering factors that influence WB (i.e., Resilience, Perceived Risk, Healthy Behaviours, and Financial Situation).
2022
de Girolamo, Giovanni; Ferrari, Clarissa; Candini, Valentina; Buizza, Chiara; Calamandrei, Gemma; Caserotti, Marta; Gavaruzzi, Teresa; Girardi, Paolo;...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s41598-022-22994-4.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.42 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.42 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2510050
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact