The U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs decision is examined, highlighting the theory of constitutional interpretation chosen by justices adhering to the majority opinion of the Court and criticizing the originalism practiced by them with the aim of overruling the precedent on abortion. The essay then focuses on the consequences to which the repetition of such an approach is likely to lead with reference to other rights and jurisprudential precedents that have hitherto characterized U.S. democracy.
Il "caso Dobbs": originalismo "estremo" e crisi del costituzionalismo negli States
Paolo VERONESI
Primo
2023
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs decision is examined, highlighting the theory of constitutional interpretation chosen by justices adhering to the majority opinion of the Court and criticizing the originalism practiced by them with the aim of overruling the precedent on abortion. The essay then focuses on the consequences to which the repetition of such an approach is likely to lead with reference to other rights and jurisprudential precedents that have hitherto characterized U.S. democracy.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VERONESI_Dobbs_BioLaw2023.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
316.36 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
316.36 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
