Background: International register of open abdomen (IROA) enrolls patients from several centers in American, European, and Asiatic continent. The aim of our study is to compare the characteristics, management and clinical outcome of adult patients treated with OA in the three continents. Material and methods: A prospective analysis of adult patients enrolled in the international register of open abdomen (IROA). Trial registration: NCT02382770. Results: 1183 patients were enrolled from American, European and Asiatic Continent. Median age was 63 years (IQR 49–74) and was higher in the European continent (65 years, p < 0.001); 57% were male. The main indication for OA was peritonitis (50.6%) followed by trauma (15.4%) and vascular emergency (13.5%) with differences among the continents (p < 0.001). Commercial NPWT was preferred in America and Europe (77.4% and 52.3% of cases) while Barker vacuum pack (48.2%) was the preferred temporary abdominal closure technique in Asia (p < 0.001). Definitive abdominal closure was achieved in 82.3% of cases in America (fascial closure in 90.2% of cases) and in 56.4% of cases in Asia (p < 0.001). Prosthesis were mostly used in Europe (17.3%, p < 0.001). The overall entero-atmospheric fistula rate 2.5%. Median open abdomen duration was 4 days (IQR 2–7). The overall intensive care unit and hospital length-of-stay were, respectively, 8 and 11 days (no differences between continents). The overall morbidity and mortality rates for America, Europe, and Asia were, respectively, 75.8%, 75.3%, 91.8% (p = 0.001) and 31.9%, 51.6%, 56.9% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There is no uniformity in OA management in the different continents. Heterogeneous adherence to international guidelines application is evident. Different temporary abdominal closure techniques in relation to indications led to different outcomes across the continents. Adherence to guidelines, combined with more consistent data, will ultimately allow to improving knowledge and outcome.

Patients with an Open Abdomen in Asian, American and European Continents: A Comparative Analysis from the International Register of Open Abdomen (IROA)

Sibilla M. G.
Primo
;
Carcoforo P.;Zese M.;Occhionorelli S.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Trotta F.;
2023

Abstract

Background: International register of open abdomen (IROA) enrolls patients from several centers in American, European, and Asiatic continent. The aim of our study is to compare the characteristics, management and clinical outcome of adult patients treated with OA in the three continents. Material and methods: A prospective analysis of adult patients enrolled in the international register of open abdomen (IROA). Trial registration: NCT02382770. Results: 1183 patients were enrolled from American, European and Asiatic Continent. Median age was 63 years (IQR 49–74) and was higher in the European continent (65 years, p < 0.001); 57% were male. The main indication for OA was peritonitis (50.6%) followed by trauma (15.4%) and vascular emergency (13.5%) with differences among the continents (p < 0.001). Commercial NPWT was preferred in America and Europe (77.4% and 52.3% of cases) while Barker vacuum pack (48.2%) was the preferred temporary abdominal closure technique in Asia (p < 0.001). Definitive abdominal closure was achieved in 82.3% of cases in America (fascial closure in 90.2% of cases) and in 56.4% of cases in Asia (p < 0.001). Prosthesis were mostly used in Europe (17.3%, p < 0.001). The overall entero-atmospheric fistula rate 2.5%. Median open abdomen duration was 4 days (IQR 2–7). The overall intensive care unit and hospital length-of-stay were, respectively, 8 and 11 days (no differences between continents). The overall morbidity and mortality rates for America, Europe, and Asia were, respectively, 75.8%, 75.3%, 91.8% (p = 0.001) and 31.9%, 51.6%, 56.9% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There is no uniformity in OA management in the different continents. Heterogeneous adherence to international guidelines application is evident. Different temporary abdominal closure techniques in relation to indications led to different outcomes across the continents. Adherence to guidelines, combined with more consistent data, will ultimately allow to improving knowledge and outcome.
2023
Sibilla, M. G.; Cremonini, C.; Portinari, M.; Carcoforo, P.; Tartaglia, D.; Cicuttin, E.; Musetti, S.; Strambi, S.; Sartelli, M.; Radica, M. K.; Catena, F.; Chiarugi, M.; Coccolini, F.; IROA Group: Montori, G.; Salvetti, F.; Negoi, I.; Zese, M.; Occhionorelli, S.; Shlyapnikov, S.; Sugrue, M.; Demetrashvili, Z.; Dondossola, D.; Ioannidis, O.; Novelli, G.; Frattini, C.; Nacoti, M.; Khor, D.; Inaba, K.; Demetriades, D.; Kaussen, T.; Jusoh, A. C.; Ghannam, W.; Sakakushev, B.; Guetta, O.; Dogjani, A.; Costa, S.; Singh, S.; Damaskos, D.; Isik, A.; Yuan, K. -C.; Trotta, F.; Rausei, S.; Martinez-Perez, A.; Bellanova, G.; Fonseca, V. C.; Hernandez, F.; Marinis, A.; Fernandes, W.; Quiodettis, M.; Bala, M.; Vereczkei, A.; Curado, R.; Fraga, G. P.; Pereira, B. M.; Gachabayov, M.; Chagerben, G. P.; Arellano, M. L.; Ozyazici, S.; Costa, G.; Tezcaner, T.; Porta, M.; Li, Y.; Karateke, F.; Manatakis, D.; Mariani, F.; Lora, F.; Sahderov, I.; Atanasov, B.; Zegarra, S.; Fattori, L.; Ivatury, R.; Xiao, J.; Ben-Ishay, O.; Zharikov, A.; Dubuisson, V.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s00268-022-06733-4-2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 660.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
660.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2500621
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact