Aims: To evaluate the fate of on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ON-pump CABG) vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OP-CABG) surgery at mid-term follow-up. Methods: From January 2008 to December 2010, 369 patients underwent surgical myocardial revascularization by means of OP-CABG techniques (n = 166) or with ON-pump CABG (n = 203). Data of the two groups of patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results: As compared with OP-CABG, in the ON-pump CABG patients, mean value of Logistic EuroSCORE (8.1 × 7.8% vs. 6.2 × 5.9%, P = 0.04), more extended coronary disease (2.7 × 0.5 vs. 2.5 × 0.7 diseased vessels/ patient, P < 0.001) consequently requiring greater number of grafts/patient (2.9 × 0.9 vs. 2.3 × 0.9, P < 0.0001), and emergency surgery (12 vs. 6%, P = 0.03) were more frequently observed. Operative mortality was 1.9% in ONpump CABG vs. 1.2% in OP-CABG (P=0.6) and incidence of stroke 2.46 vs. 1.81% (P = 0.7). The incidence of stroke was reduced at 1.2% when OP-CABG PAS-Port 'clamp-less' technique was used. Intraoperatively, costs per patient were higher for OP-CABG vs. ON-pump CABG (1.930,00 R1.050,00 s, if PAS-port system was included, vs. 1.060,00 s for ON-pump surgery). ICU stay (1.9 × 1.0 days vs. 1.4 × 0.7 days) and total postoperative in-hospital stay (5.3 × 3.3 days vs. 5.5 × 3.5 days) were similar in both groups. At 4 years, survival (91 × 13% in the ON-pump CABG vs. 84 × 19% in the OP-CABG), freedom from major adverse cardiac events (composite end-point of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and repeat coronary revascularization of the target lesion) (82 × 9% vs. 76 × 14%), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (80 × 11% vs. 72 × 16%) were not significantly different. Freedom from late cardiac death was slightly significant higher after ON-pump CABG (98 × 4% vs. 90 × 10%, P = 0.05). Conclusion: Mid-term freedom from composite end-points is similar after ON-pump CABG and OP-CABG. Freedom from cardiac death appears to be better after ON-pump CABG. OP-CABG needs for more expensive surgical technique. OP-CABG performed by an experienced surgical team using 'clamp-less' techniques can be an effective strategy in reducing postoperative stroke.
The fate at mid-term follow-up of the on-pump vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
Zeitani JPenultimo
;
2015
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the fate of on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ON-pump CABG) vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OP-CABG) surgery at mid-term follow-up. Methods: From January 2008 to December 2010, 369 patients underwent surgical myocardial revascularization by means of OP-CABG techniques (n = 166) or with ON-pump CABG (n = 203). Data of the two groups of patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results: As compared with OP-CABG, in the ON-pump CABG patients, mean value of Logistic EuroSCORE (8.1 × 7.8% vs. 6.2 × 5.9%, P = 0.04), more extended coronary disease (2.7 × 0.5 vs. 2.5 × 0.7 diseased vessels/ patient, P < 0.001) consequently requiring greater number of grafts/patient (2.9 × 0.9 vs. 2.3 × 0.9, P < 0.0001), and emergency surgery (12 vs. 6%, P = 0.03) were more frequently observed. Operative mortality was 1.9% in ONpump CABG vs. 1.2% in OP-CABG (P=0.6) and incidence of stroke 2.46 vs. 1.81% (P = 0.7). The incidence of stroke was reduced at 1.2% when OP-CABG PAS-Port 'clamp-less' technique was used. Intraoperatively, costs per patient were higher for OP-CABG vs. ON-pump CABG (1.930,00 R1.050,00 s, if PAS-port system was included, vs. 1.060,00 s for ON-pump surgery). ICU stay (1.9 × 1.0 days vs. 1.4 × 0.7 days) and total postoperative in-hospital stay (5.3 × 3.3 days vs. 5.5 × 3.5 days) were similar in both groups. At 4 years, survival (91 × 13% in the ON-pump CABG vs. 84 × 19% in the OP-CABG), freedom from major adverse cardiac events (composite end-point of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and repeat coronary revascularization of the target lesion) (82 × 9% vs. 76 × 14%), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (80 × 11% vs. 72 × 16%) were not significantly different. Freedom from late cardiac death was slightly significant higher after ON-pump CABG (98 × 4% vs. 90 × 10%, P = 0.05). Conclusion: Mid-term freedom from composite end-points is similar after ON-pump CABG and OP-CABG. Freedom from cardiac death appears to be better after ON-pump CABG. OP-CABG needs for more expensive surgical technique. OP-CABG performed by an experienced surgical team using 'clamp-less' techniques can be an effective strategy in reducing postoperative stroke.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
jcm.0000000000000041.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
320.49 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
320.49 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.