Currently, the ability to perform DMEK is widely perceived as the hallmark of superior technical prowess in the field of corneal surgery, thereby unduly driving many novice surgeons to solely perform DMEK. Beyond the analysis of empirical evidence from published data, surgical decision-making must be informed by pragmatic and pru- dent determination of the right procedure for the right patient by the right surgeon. Ultimately, both DMEK and ultrathin DSAEK represent valuable tools in the surgical armamentarium of any corneal specialist.
The Ongoing Debate: Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
Busin, Massimo
Primo
;Yu, Angeli ChristyUltimo
2020
Abstract
Currently, the ability to perform DMEK is widely perceived as the hallmark of superior technical prowess in the field of corneal surgery, thereby unduly driving many novice surgeons to solely perform DMEK. Beyond the analysis of empirical evidence from published data, surgical decision-making must be informed by pragmatic and pru- dent determination of the right procedure for the right patient by the right surgeon. Ultimately, both DMEK and ultrathin DSAEK represent valuable tools in the surgical armamentarium of any corneal specialist.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
j.ophtha.2020.03.023.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
697.18 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
697.18 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.