Gait rehabilitation is a critical factor in functional recovery after a stroke. The aim of this pragmatic observational study was to identify the optimal dose and timing of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) that can lead to a favourable outcome in a sample of subacute stroke survivors. Subacute patients with stroke who underwent a RAGT within a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program were enrolled. A set of clinical (i.e. age, type of stroke and time since stroke) and rehabilitation stay outcomes (length of stay and RAGT number of sessions) were recorded to evaluate their impact on functional outcome measures by functional independence measure (FIM) or functional ambulation category (FAC). We included 236 patients (62.73 ± 11.82 year old); 38.44% were females, and 59.32% were ischaemic stroke patients. Patients that received at least 14 RAGT sessions, had 15.83% more chance to be responders compared to those that receive less sessions (P = 0.006). Similarly, younger patients (≤60 years) were more prone to be responders (+15.1%). Lastly, an early rehabilitation (<6 weeks) was found to be more efficient (+21.09%) in determining responsiveness (P < 0.001). Becoming newly independent for gait, that refers to a FAC score ≥4, was related with age and RAGT sessions (P = 0.001). In conclusion, a younger age (≤60 years), an early rehabilitation (<6 weeks since stroke) and a higher RAGT dose (at least 14 sessions) were related to a favourable outcome in patients with subacute stroke.

Is robot-assisted gait training intensity a determinant of functional recovery early after stroke? A pragmatic observational study of clinical care

Lissom L. O.
Primo
;
Lamberti N.
Secondo
;
Manfredini F.
Penultimo
;
Straudi S.
Ultimo
2022

Abstract

Gait rehabilitation is a critical factor in functional recovery after a stroke. The aim of this pragmatic observational study was to identify the optimal dose and timing of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) that can lead to a favourable outcome in a sample of subacute stroke survivors. Subacute patients with stroke who underwent a RAGT within a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program were enrolled. A set of clinical (i.e. age, type of stroke and time since stroke) and rehabilitation stay outcomes (length of stay and RAGT number of sessions) were recorded to evaluate their impact on functional outcome measures by functional independence measure (FIM) or functional ambulation category (FAC). We included 236 patients (62.73 ± 11.82 year old); 38.44% were females, and 59.32% were ischaemic stroke patients. Patients that received at least 14 RAGT sessions, had 15.83% more chance to be responders compared to those that receive less sessions (P = 0.006). Similarly, younger patients (≤60 years) were more prone to be responders (+15.1%). Lastly, an early rehabilitation (<6 weeks) was found to be more efficient (+21.09%) in determining responsiveness (P < 0.001). Becoming newly independent for gait, that refers to a FAC score ≥4, was related with age and RAGT sessions (P = 0.001). In conclusion, a younger age (≤60 years), an early rehabilitation (<6 weeks since stroke) and a higher RAGT dose (at least 14 sessions) were related to a favourable outcome in patients with subacute stroke.
2022
Lissom, L. O.; Lamberti, N.; Lavezzi, S.; Basaglia, N.; Manfredini, F.; Straudi, S.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
hdl 113922493155 pre-print.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Pre-print
Tipologia: Pre-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.04 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
is_robot_assisted_gait_training_intensity_a.12.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 450.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
450.8 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2493155
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact