Current study aims to provide an alternative view of open innovation, entangled and framed within social-collective rationales for its adoption. Thereby, we propose a bandwagon model for open innovation. Our findings confirm that today momentum could be explained by bandwagon behavior. However, the superiority of innovative performance envisaged for the open model is a fact solidly confirmed by empirical evidence. These results clarify that, for once, practice and academia are aligned. Consistently with the social-collective logic, «the future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants» (Chesbrough 2017, p. 35).

Are we really open for innovation?

Orlando Beatrice
2018

Abstract

Current study aims to provide an alternative view of open innovation, entangled and framed within social-collective rationales for its adoption. Thereby, we propose a bandwagon model for open innovation. Our findings confirm that today momentum could be explained by bandwagon behavior. However, the superiority of innovative performance envisaged for the open model is a fact solidly confirmed by empirical evidence. These results clarify that, for once, practice and academia are aligned. Consistently with the social-collective logic, «the future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants» (Chesbrough 2017, p. 35).
2018
978-88-255-1425-4
978-88-255-1052-2
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
mOno are we really.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 678.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
678.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2452268
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact