Aims: To investigate the feasibility of transvenous left ventricular (LV) pacing by autocapture at long term. A reliable measurement of LV evoked response (ER) is the pivotal requirement for beat-to-beat detection of ventricular capture and automatic output adjustment. Methods and results: Seven patients with accepted class I indication to permanent cardiac pacing received a DDDR pacemaker with automatic output adjustment based on beat-to-beat capture verification (Insignia Ultra 1290, Guidant), whose ventricular port was connected to a LV lead placed in a branch of the coronary sinus. The device allows LV threshold trending, performing a threshold test every 21 h, and diagnoses acute and non-acute issues of ER detection during follow up. Average follow up after implantation was 34 ± 6 months (range 28-45, median 34). Left ventricular pacing threshold showed an increase from implantation (1.2 ± 0.4 V at 0.4 ms) that peaked at week 4 (1.6 ± 0.7 V at 0.4 ms), and returned to baseline (1.1 ± 0.5 at 0.4 ms) by the end of the 7th week. Autocapture performance at long term, as assessed by the trend of LV threshold and of ER diagnostic issues, did not show any pitfall. Conclusions: Our observations support the feasibility and safety of capture verification during LV pacing alone. A possible application of this pacing technology could be biventricular stimulation. © The Author 2007.

Left ventricular pacing by automatic capture verification

Bertini M.;
2007

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the feasibility of transvenous left ventricular (LV) pacing by autocapture at long term. A reliable measurement of LV evoked response (ER) is the pivotal requirement for beat-to-beat detection of ventricular capture and automatic output adjustment. Methods and results: Seven patients with accepted class I indication to permanent cardiac pacing received a DDDR pacemaker with automatic output adjustment based on beat-to-beat capture verification (Insignia Ultra 1290, Guidant), whose ventricular port was connected to a LV lead placed in a branch of the coronary sinus. The device allows LV threshold trending, performing a threshold test every 21 h, and diagnoses acute and non-acute issues of ER detection during follow up. Average follow up after implantation was 34 ± 6 months (range 28-45, median 34). Left ventricular pacing threshold showed an increase from implantation (1.2 ± 0.4 V at 0.4 ms) that peaked at week 4 (1.6 ± 0.7 V at 0.4 ms), and returned to baseline (1.1 ± 0.5 at 0.4 ms) by the end of the 7th week. Autocapture performance at long term, as assessed by the trend of LV threshold and of ER diagnostic issues, did not show any pitfall. Conclusions: Our observations support the feasibility and safety of capture verification during LV pacing alone. A possible application of this pacing technology could be biventricular stimulation. © The Author 2007.
2007
Biffi, M.; Bertini, M.; Ziacchi, M.; Boriani, G.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2437693
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact