Objectives: While the algorithm to diagnose celiac disease (CD) in children with elevated anti-transglutaminase IgA (TGA-IgA) titers (> 10 times upper limit of normal, ULN) is well defined, the management of children with low TGA-IgA values represents a clinical challenge. We aimed to identify the diagnostic value of persistently low positive TGA-IgA titers in predicting CD in children. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed children with symptoms or signs of CD, not eligible for a no-biopsy approach. We included children with at least two TGA-IgA measurements, EMA assessment and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsies. TGA-IgA values were provided as multiples of upper limit normal (ULN). Patients were classified in groups according to median TGA-IgA values: A (TGA-IgA>1 ≤ 5 x ULN; defined as “low-positive”), B (TGA-IgA > 5 < 10 x ULN; “moderate-positive”) and C (controls). Results: Data of 281 children were analyzed. Of 162 children in Group A, CD was diagnosed in 142 (87.7%), while normal duodenal mucosa was found in 20. In Group B, all 62 children (100%) received a CD diagnosis. Group C included 57 controls. EMA were undetectable in 31 (15%) of mucosal atrophy cases. On the ROC curve (AUC = 0.910), a mean value of 1.7 ULN showed a sensitivity of 81.4% and specificity of 81.8% to predict mucosal damage. Conclusions: Repeated low or moderate TGA-IgA values (< 5 ULN or <10 ULN) are good predictors of a CD diagnosis. Symptomatic children with persistently low positive TGA-IgA titers should undergo EGD regardless of their EMA status.

Diagnostic Value of Persistently Low Positive TGA-IgA Titers in Symptomatic children with Suspected Celiac Disease

Caio, Giacomo
Penultimo
Conceptualization
;
2021

Abstract

Objectives: While the algorithm to diagnose celiac disease (CD) in children with elevated anti-transglutaminase IgA (TGA-IgA) titers (> 10 times upper limit of normal, ULN) is well defined, the management of children with low TGA-IgA values represents a clinical challenge. We aimed to identify the diagnostic value of persistently low positive TGA-IgA titers in predicting CD in children. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed children with symptoms or signs of CD, not eligible for a no-biopsy approach. We included children with at least two TGA-IgA measurements, EMA assessment and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsies. TGA-IgA values were provided as multiples of upper limit normal (ULN). Patients were classified in groups according to median TGA-IgA values: A (TGA-IgA>1 ≤ 5 x ULN; defined as “low-positive”), B (TGA-IgA > 5 < 10 x ULN; “moderate-positive”) and C (controls). Results: Data of 281 children were analyzed. Of 162 children in Group A, CD was diagnosed in 142 (87.7%), while normal duodenal mucosa was found in 20. In Group B, all 62 children (100%) received a CD diagnosis. Group C included 57 controls. EMA were undetectable in 31 (15%) of mucosal atrophy cases. On the ROC curve (AUC = 0.910), a mean value of 1.7 ULN showed a sensitivity of 81.4% and specificity of 81.8% to predict mucosal damage. Conclusions: Repeated low or moderate TGA-IgA values (< 5 ULN or <10 ULN) are good predictors of a CD diagnosis. Symptomatic children with persistently low positive TGA-IgA titers should undergo EGD regardless of their EMA status.
2021
Trovato, Chiara Maria; Montuori, Monica; Morelli, Annalisa; Fegatelli, Danilo Alunni; Vestri, Annarita; Giordano, Carla; Cucchiara, Salvatore; Caio, Giacomo; Oliva, Salvatore
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Diagnostic_Value_of_Persistently_Low_Positive.16.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 653.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
653.76 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2437244
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact