Purpose – This paper investigates the role of boundary objects and boundary work in the integration of risk management (RM) and performance management (PM) systems. In particular, the paper combines theoretical insights with an empirical focus to examine how shared contexts are created through the boundary work performed by key actors across knowledge boundaries. Design/methodology/approach – The paper develops an exploratory qualitative case study from a local government context. The methodology is based on document analysis and semi-structured interviews. Findings – Boundary objects can act as knowledge integration mechanisms, allowing key actors to understand the meanings and uses of RM and PM practices. The paper shows how collaborative versus competitive boundary work exerted by key actors can explain the creation of shared contexts leading to integration between RM and PM. Originality/value – The results contribute to the debate about the integration of RM with other managerial systems. Differently from previous research, the integration theme is addressed in the present work by looking specifically to the integration between RM and PM. In doing so, the role of both boundary objects and the boundary work performed by relevant actors to demarcate their legitimacy and autonomy over preferred practices is portrayed. Keywords Risk management, Boundary objects, Boundary work, Boundaries, Performance management Paper type - Research paper

The integration of risk and performance management: the role of boundary objects

Bracci Enrico
Primo
Conceptualization
;
Gobbo Giorgia
Secondo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Papi Luca
Ultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2022

Abstract

Purpose – This paper investigates the role of boundary objects and boundary work in the integration of risk management (RM) and performance management (PM) systems. In particular, the paper combines theoretical insights with an empirical focus to examine how shared contexts are created through the boundary work performed by key actors across knowledge boundaries. Design/methodology/approach – The paper develops an exploratory qualitative case study from a local government context. The methodology is based on document analysis and semi-structured interviews. Findings – Boundary objects can act as knowledge integration mechanisms, allowing key actors to understand the meanings and uses of RM and PM practices. The paper shows how collaborative versus competitive boundary work exerted by key actors can explain the creation of shared contexts leading to integration between RM and PM. Originality/value – The results contribute to the debate about the integration of RM with other managerial systems. Differently from previous research, the integration theme is addressed in the present work by looking specifically to the integration between RM and PM. In doing so, the role of both boundary objects and the boundary work performed by relevant actors to demarcate their legitimacy and autonomy over preferred practices is portrayed. Keywords Risk management, Boundary objects, Boundary work, Boundaries, Performance management Paper type - Research paper
2022
Bracci, Enrico; Gobbo, Giorgia; Papi, Luca
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10-1108_JPBAFM-02-2020-0024_iris.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Full text ahead of print
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.53 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.53 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2434065
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact