Heated debate surrounds the view that the indigenous Lower and Middle Palaeolithic populations of Europe did not possess the same cognitive capacities as modern humans. Different positions range from the staunch claim that Neanderthals were archaeologically – and thus behaviorally and cognitively – inferior and that contemporaneous Homo sapiens were superior, to opposing claims that Neanderthals were indistinguishable from members of our own Palaeolithic population in Africa and Eurasia. Some avoid this dichotomy by supporting a middle position that holds that the differences between the two human types made neither population better or worse than the other in ways visible to natural and cultural selection . Aside from the different images scholars maintain of our ancestors, the variable success in identifying the cognitive abilities they possessed indirectly relies on a wide range of archaeological, physical and bio-molecular proxy evidence in the material and immaterial records.

What the Southern European Record Tells Us about the Early Evolution of Symbolic Culture

Peresani
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2020

Abstract

Heated debate surrounds the view that the indigenous Lower and Middle Palaeolithic populations of Europe did not possess the same cognitive capacities as modern humans. Different positions range from the staunch claim that Neanderthals were archaeologically – and thus behaviorally and cognitively – inferior and that contemporaneous Homo sapiens were superior, to opposing claims that Neanderthals were indistinguishable from members of our own Palaeolithic population in Africa and Eurasia. Some avoid this dichotomy by supporting a middle position that holds that the differences between the two human types made neither population better or worse than the other in ways visible to natural and cultural selection . Aside from the different images scholars maintain of our ancestors, the variable success in identifying the cognitive abilities they possessed indirectly relies on a wide range of archaeological, physical and bio-molecular proxy evidence in the material and immaterial records.
2020
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
113922432378.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: articolo recensito
Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 872.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
872.94 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
712088.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Recensione a pp. 725-726
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 20.18 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
20.18 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2432378
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact