This paper presents numerical cross comparisons and benchmark results for two different kinetic numerical methods, capable of describing relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics in a wide range of kinematic regimes, typical of relevant physics applications, such as transport phenomena in quark-gluon plasmas. We refer to relativistic lattice Boltzmann versus Monte Carlo test-particle methods. Lacking any realistic option for accurate validation vis-á-vis experimental data, we check the consistency of our results against established simulation packages available in the literature. We successfully compare the results of the two aforementioned numerical approaches for momentum integrated quantities like the hydrostatic and dynamical pressure profiles, the collective flow, and the heat flux. These results corroborate the confidence of the robustness and correctness of these computational methods and on the accurate calibration of their numerical parameters with respect to the physical transport coefficients. Our numerical results are made available as Supplemental Material, with the aim of establishing a reference benchmark for other numerical approaches.
Dissipative hydrodynamics of relativistic shock waves in a quark gluon plasma: Comparing and benchmarking alternate numerical methods
Gabbana, A.
Primo
;Simeoni, D.;Tripiccione, R.Ultimo
2020
Abstract
This paper presents numerical cross comparisons and benchmark results for two different kinetic numerical methods, capable of describing relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics in a wide range of kinematic regimes, typical of relevant physics applications, such as transport phenomena in quark-gluon plasmas. We refer to relativistic lattice Boltzmann versus Monte Carlo test-particle methods. Lacking any realistic option for accurate validation vis-á-vis experimental data, we check the consistency of our results against established simulation packages available in the literature. We successfully compare the results of the two aforementioned numerical approaches for momentum integrated quantities like the hydrostatic and dynamical pressure profiles, the collective flow, and the heat flux. These results corroborate the confidence of the robustness and correctness of these computational methods and on the accurate calibration of their numerical parameters with respect to the physical transport coefficients. Our numerical results are made available as Supplemental Material, with the aim of establishing a reference benchmark for other numerical approaches.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1912.10455.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: pre print arXive
Tipologia:
Pre-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
745.04 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
745.04 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
PhysRevC.101.064904.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
894.42 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
894.42 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.