This paper presents numerical cross comparisons and benchmark results for two different kinetic numerical methods, capable of describing relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics in a wide range of kinematic regimes, typical of relevant physics applications, such as transport phenomena in quark-gluon plasmas. We refer to relativistic lattice Boltzmann versus Monte Carlo test-particle methods. Lacking any realistic option for accurate validation vis-á-vis experimental data, we check the consistency of our results against established simulation packages available in the literature. We successfully compare the results of the two aforementioned numerical approaches for momentum integrated quantities like the hydrostatic and dynamical pressure profiles, the collective flow, and the heat flux. These results corroborate the confidence of the robustness and correctness of these computational methods and on the accurate calibration of their numerical parameters with respect to the physical transport coefficients. Our numerical results are made available as Supplemental Material, with the aim of establishing a reference benchmark for other numerical approaches.

Dissipative hydrodynamics of relativistic shock waves in a quark gluon plasma: Comparing and benchmarking alternate numerical methods

Gabbana, A.
Primo
;
Simeoni, D.;Tripiccione, R.
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

This paper presents numerical cross comparisons and benchmark results for two different kinetic numerical methods, capable of describing relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics in a wide range of kinematic regimes, typical of relevant physics applications, such as transport phenomena in quark-gluon plasmas. We refer to relativistic lattice Boltzmann versus Monte Carlo test-particle methods. Lacking any realistic option for accurate validation vis-á-vis experimental data, we check the consistency of our results against established simulation packages available in the literature. We successfully compare the results of the two aforementioned numerical approaches for momentum integrated quantities like the hydrostatic and dynamical pressure profiles, the collective flow, and the heat flux. These results corroborate the confidence of the robustness and correctness of these computational methods and on the accurate calibration of their numerical parameters with respect to the physical transport coefficients. Our numerical results are made available as Supplemental Material, with the aim of establishing a reference benchmark for other numerical approaches.
2020
Gabbana, A.; Plumari, S.; Galesi, G.; Greco, V.; Simeoni, D.; Succi, S.; Tripiccione, R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1912.10455.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: pre print arXive
Tipologia: Pre-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 745.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
745.04 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
PhysRevC.101.064904.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 894.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
894.42 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2419720
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact