Objectives Antibiotic resistance is a significant cause of morbidity, mortality and social and economic burden. About 700,000 deaths each year in the world may be due to bacteria resistant to antibiotics. The large quantity of antimicrobials used in hospitals let microorganisms in this setting to develop genetic mutations allowing them to be more resistant to antibiotics than those isolated in the community. In hospital setting, the Probiotic Cleaning Hygiene System (PCHS), based on Bacillus probiotic spores, showed to decrease surface pathogens up to 90% more than conventional chemical cleaning (CCC). The aim of the study was to compare PCHS to CCC in terms of reduction of Healthcare Associated Infections (HAIs) and related antibiotic resistances and to evaluate the economic consequences of PCHS vs. CCC through a budget impact analysis (BIA) from the hospital perspective in Italy. Methods Incidence rates of HAIs and related antibiotic resistances were estimated from a multicenter pre-post (6 months CCC + 6 months PCHS) intervention study conducted on 11,461 patients in five Italian hospitals (internal medicine, geriatrics and neurology wards). A propensity score matching (PSM) procedure has been applied in order to select and compare patients managed with PCHS or CCC with the same clinical characteristics. A BIA model was developed to compare the current scenario of use of CCC with a future scenario considering PCHS in the next five years. Being the costs of the two sanitation approaches comparable, the analysis focused on costs of pharmacological treatments for the management of HAIs, which were available from the same study. Results The PSM yielded a sample of 8320 patients (4160 per group) with identical clinical characteristics (100% reduction bias on all the variables). The cumulative incidence of HAI decreased significantly from 4.6% to 2.4% (p <0.0001) moving from the traditional sanitation system to PCHS (OR = 0.47, CI95% 0.37-0.60), with antibiotic resistances of 1.13% and 0.53%, respectively. The use of PCHS over CCC in internal medicine, geriatrics and neurology wards in Italian hospitals in the next 5 years is expected to save globally 65 million Euros, of which, 54 million Euros for the management of resistant HAIs. Discussion PCHS could be a cost-saving strategy in comparison to conventional chemical cleaning for the hospital environments, from an Italian hospital perspective, leading to lower HAIs rates and antibiotic resistances. The appropriateness of antibiotics and the promotion of environmentally sustainable sanitation systems, such as the PCHS, could create the conditions to increase protection of health, not only in Italy, but throughout the world.

A probiotic-based sanitation system for the reduction of healthcare associated infections and antimicrobial resistances: a budget impact analysis

Elisabetta Caselli
Conceptualization
;
Sante Mazzacane
Ultimo
Data Curation
2020

Abstract

Objectives Antibiotic resistance is a significant cause of morbidity, mortality and social and economic burden. About 700,000 deaths each year in the world may be due to bacteria resistant to antibiotics. The large quantity of antimicrobials used in hospitals let microorganisms in this setting to develop genetic mutations allowing them to be more resistant to antibiotics than those isolated in the community. In hospital setting, the Probiotic Cleaning Hygiene System (PCHS), based on Bacillus probiotic spores, showed to decrease surface pathogens up to 90% more than conventional chemical cleaning (CCC). The aim of the study was to compare PCHS to CCC in terms of reduction of Healthcare Associated Infections (HAIs) and related antibiotic resistances and to evaluate the economic consequences of PCHS vs. CCC through a budget impact analysis (BIA) from the hospital perspective in Italy. Methods Incidence rates of HAIs and related antibiotic resistances were estimated from a multicenter pre-post (6 months CCC + 6 months PCHS) intervention study conducted on 11,461 patients in five Italian hospitals (internal medicine, geriatrics and neurology wards). A propensity score matching (PSM) procedure has been applied in order to select and compare patients managed with PCHS or CCC with the same clinical characteristics. A BIA model was developed to compare the current scenario of use of CCC with a future scenario considering PCHS in the next five years. Being the costs of the two sanitation approaches comparable, the analysis focused on costs of pharmacological treatments for the management of HAIs, which were available from the same study. Results The PSM yielded a sample of 8320 patients (4160 per group) with identical clinical characteristics (100% reduction bias on all the variables). The cumulative incidence of HAI decreased significantly from 4.6% to 2.4% (p <0.0001) moving from the traditional sanitation system to PCHS (OR = 0.47, CI95% 0.37-0.60), with antibiotic resistances of 1.13% and 0.53%, respectively. The use of PCHS over CCC in internal medicine, geriatrics and neurology wards in Italian hospitals in the next 5 years is expected to save globally 65 million Euros, of which, 54 million Euros for the management of resistant HAIs. Discussion PCHS could be a cost-saving strategy in comparison to conventional chemical cleaning for the hospital environments, from an Italian hospital perspective, leading to lower HAIs rates and antibiotic resistances. The appropriateness of antibiotics and the promotion of environmentally sustainable sanitation systems, such as the PCHS, could create the conditions to increase protection of health, not only in Italy, but throughout the world.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
abs.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 477.39 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
477.39 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2419599
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact