Listening effort (LE) describes the allocation of attentional and cognitive resources for successful listening. In adverse conditions, the mental demands for listening increase, interfering with other cognitive functions. This is especially relevant in learning spaces, wherecomplex tasks that recruit more cognitive resources (e.g. memorization of information, comprehension) are performed by the students. The present study focuses on the case of university classrooms, and investigates the effects of different types of masking noise on both speech intelligibility (SI) and LE. Speech-in-noise tests in the Italian language were presented to 25 young adults with normal hearing (13 native, 12 non-native listeners ) within an existing university classroom, located in Bozen-Bolzano (Italy). The tests were presented in three listening conditions (quiet, stationary noise, and fluctuating noise), grouping the listeners around two locations within the classroom. The task performance was assessed using both SI and two proxy measures of LE: response time (RT) and subjective ratings of effort. Longer RTs and higher subjective ratings were taken to reflect increased LE. Results in noisy conditions were compared to the quiet condition. A disadvantage in task accuracy performance was found for non-native compared to native listeners; concerning RT, it was found that when the target signal is masked by a fluctuating noise, additional processing time is requested to non-native listeners compared to their native peers. The interaction was not pointed out by subjective ratings, supporting the hypothesis of a different sensitivity of the two proxy measures of LE.

Speech intelligibility and listening effort in university classrooms for native and non-native Italian listeners

Chiara Visentin
Primo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Nicola Prodi
Secondo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2019

Abstract

Listening effort (LE) describes the allocation of attentional and cognitive resources for successful listening. In adverse conditions, the mental demands for listening increase, interfering with other cognitive functions. This is especially relevant in learning spaces, wherecomplex tasks that recruit more cognitive resources (e.g. memorization of information, comprehension) are performed by the students. The present study focuses on the case of university classrooms, and investigates the effects of different types of masking noise on both speech intelligibility (SI) and LE. Speech-in-noise tests in the Italian language were presented to 25 young adults with normal hearing (13 native, 12 non-native listeners ) within an existing university classroom, located in Bozen-Bolzano (Italy). The tests were presented in three listening conditions (quiet, stationary noise, and fluctuating noise), grouping the listeners around two locations within the classroom. The task performance was assessed using both SI and two proxy measures of LE: response time (RT) and subjective ratings of effort. Longer RTs and higher subjective ratings were taken to reflect increased LE. Results in noisy conditions were compared to the quiet condition. A disadvantage in task accuracy performance was found for non-native compared to native listeners; concerning RT, it was found that when the target signal is masked by a fluctuating noise, additional processing time is requested to non-native listeners compared to their native peers. The interaction was not pointed out by subjective ratings, supporting the hypothesis of a different sensitivity of the two proxy measures of LE.
2019
Visentin, Chiara; Prodi, Nicola; Cappelletti, Francesca; Torresin, Simone; Gasparella, Andrea
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019.1351010X19882314.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 561.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
561.31 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2409251
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact