In emergency times, many jurisdictions include more or less intense types of suspension of the rights and constitutional guarantees in order to protect the state. During the 70s different countries were subject to terrorist threat, but not all of them were able to adopt the same countermeasures: in Great Britain a model based on the deliberation of an exceptional regime was adopted by the executive part of the government, which was free from all the jurisdictional controls. Only at a later stage, it was controlled by the Parliament. In countries as Spain, France and Western Germany, a model which allowed to precise institutions (President, Head of State, Parliament) was chosen to impose specific and really exceptional conditions for a limited period. This article analyses the similar regulatories of the different countries about the terrorist threat, underlining the importance of the contributions given by comparative law in the construction of a specific legislation.
In tempi di emergenza, molte giurisdizioni includono tipi più o meno intensi di sospensione dei diritti e garanzie costituzionali al fine di proteggere lo stato. Durante gli anni '70 diversi paesi erano soggetti alla minaccia terroristica, ma non tutti erano in grado di adottare le stesse contromisure: in Gran Bretagna un modello basato sulla deliberazione di un regime eccezionale era stato adottato dalla parte esecutiva del governo, che era libera da tutti i controlli giurisdizionali. Solo in una fase successiva, è stato controllato dal Parlamento. In paesi come la Spagna, la Francia e la Germania occidentale, è stato scelto un modello che consentiva a istituzioni precise (Presidente, Capo dello Stato, Parlamento) di imporre condizioni specifiche e davvero eccezionali per un periodo limitato. Questo articolo analizza le normative simili dei diversi paesi sulla minaccia terroristica, sottolineando l'importanza dei contributi forniti dalla legge comparata nella costruzione di una legislazione specifica.
La legislazione dell’emergenza e sui pentiti in prospettiva storica e comparata [The Emergency Legislation and the Penal Reward System: An Historical and Comparative Analysis]
DONATO CASTRONUOVO
2019
Abstract
In emergency times, many jurisdictions include more or less intense types of suspension of the rights and constitutional guarantees in order to protect the state. During the 70s different countries were subject to terrorist threat, but not all of them were able to adopt the same countermeasures: in Great Britain a model based on the deliberation of an exceptional regime was adopted by the executive part of the government, which was free from all the jurisdictional controls. Only at a later stage, it was controlled by the Parliament. In countries as Spain, France and Western Germany, a model which allowed to precise institutions (President, Head of State, Parliament) was chosen to impose specific and really exceptional conditions for a limited period. This article analyses the similar regulatories of the different countries about the terrorist threat, underlining the importance of the contributions given by comparative law in the construction of a specific legislation.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1127-0195-28194-2.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
285.61 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
285.61 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.