To evaluate the impact of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening on stage distribution at diagnosis, and to estimate relative incidence rates by stage in screened at first and subsequent rounds vs. unscreened. We included all incident cases occurring in 2000–2008 in 50- to 71-year-olds residing in areas with an FIT-screening programme. Multinomial logistic models were computed to estimate the relative risk ratio (RRR) of stages I and IV, compared to stage II + III, adjusting for age, sex, geographical area, and incidence year. Proportions were then used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) by stage for screened subjects at the first and at subsequent rounds vs. unscreened subjects, applying the expected changes in overall incidence during screening phases. 11,663 cancers were included: 5965 in not-invited and 5,698 in invited subjects, 3,425 of whom attendees. Compared to not-invited, invited subjects had RRR 2.04 (95% CI: 1.84; 2.46) of stage I and RRR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69; 0.87) of stage IV. Differences were stronger comparing attendees vs. nonattendees. Interval cancers were more frequently stage I compared to non-invited (RRR 1.54; 95% CI: 1.15; 2.04), but there was no difference for stage IV. IRRs in screened at first round vs. unscreened were 4.6 (95% CI: 4.2; 5.1), 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3; 1.5) and 0.7 (95% CI: 0.6; 0.9) for stages I, II + III and IV, respectively; in the following rounds the IRRs of screened vs. unscreened were 1.4 (95% CI: 1.2; 1.6), 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7; 0.9) and 0.3 (95% CI: 0.1; 0.4) for stages I, II + III and IV, respectively. FIT screening reduces the incidence of metastatic cancers by about 70% after the first round.

Impact of screening programme using the faecal immunochemical test on stage of colorectal cancer: Results from the IMPATTO study

Ferretti, Stefano
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
De Togni, Aldo;Palmonari, Caterina;
2019

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening on stage distribution at diagnosis, and to estimate relative incidence rates by stage in screened at first and subsequent rounds vs. unscreened. We included all incident cases occurring in 2000–2008 in 50- to 71-year-olds residing in areas with an FIT-screening programme. Multinomial logistic models were computed to estimate the relative risk ratio (RRR) of stages I and IV, compared to stage II + III, adjusting for age, sex, geographical area, and incidence year. Proportions were then used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) by stage for screened subjects at the first and at subsequent rounds vs. unscreened subjects, applying the expected changes in overall incidence during screening phases. 11,663 cancers were included: 5965 in not-invited and 5,698 in invited subjects, 3,425 of whom attendees. Compared to not-invited, invited subjects had RRR 2.04 (95% CI: 1.84; 2.46) of stage I and RRR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69; 0.87) of stage IV. Differences were stronger comparing attendees vs. nonattendees. Interval cancers were more frequently stage I compared to non-invited (RRR 1.54; 95% CI: 1.15; 2.04), but there was no difference for stage IV. IRRs in screened at first round vs. unscreened were 4.6 (95% CI: 4.2; 5.1), 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3; 1.5) and 0.7 (95% CI: 0.6; 0.9) for stages I, II + III and IV, respectively; in the following rounds the IRRs of screened vs. unscreened were 1.4 (95% CI: 1.2; 1.6), 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7; 0.9) and 0.3 (95% CI: 0.1; 0.4) for stages I, II + III and IV, respectively. FIT screening reduces the incidence of metastatic cancers by about 70% after the first round.
2019
Vicentini, Massimo; Zorzi, Manuel; Bovo, Emanuela; Mancuso, Pamela; Zappa, Marco; Manneschi, Gianfranco; Mangone, Lucia; Rossi, Paolo Giorgi; Grazzini, Grazia; Mantellini, Paola; Caldarella, Adele; Intrieri, Teresa; Anghinoni, Emanuela; Senore, Carlo; Tisano, Francesco; Ziino, Antonio Colanino; Malignaggi, Sabina; Passanisi, Guido; Rugge, Massimo; Turrin, Anna; Piffer, Silvano; Gentilini, Maria; Rizzello, Roberto; Pertile, Riccardo; Sensi, Flavio; Cesaraccio, Rosaria; Interieri, Teresa; Ferretti, Stefano; Collina, Natalina; Petrucci, Chiara; Fanetti, Anna Clara; Cecconami, Lorella; Fusco, Mario; Vitale, Maria Francesca; Castaing, Marine; Ippolito, Antonella; Varvara, Massimo; Pesce, Paola; Filiberti, Rosa; Borciani, Elisabetta; Seghini, Pietro; Stracci, Fabrizio; Malaspina, Morena; Serraino, Diego; Falcini, Fabio; Giuliani, Orietta; Pannozzo, Fabio; Curatella, Simonetta; Calabretta, Francesca; Bellardini, Paola; Carrozzi, Giuliano; Bisanti, Luigi; Russo, Antonio Giampiero; Silvestri, Anna Rita; Tidone, Enrica; Giacomin, Adriano; Azzoni, Alberto; Mazzucco, Walter; Cusimano, Rosanna; Campari, Cinzia; Caroli, Stefania; Michiara, Maria; Sgargi, Paolo; De Togni, Aldo; Palmonari, Caterina; Casella, Claudia; Puppo, Antonella
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
International Journal of Cancer-Impact of colorectal.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 431.62 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
431.62 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2403933
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact