Several fish species are characterized by social systems in which individuals prefer to interact with specific group mates. However, there is no clear evidence that such associations are equitable, that is, they are mutual between individuals. We addressed this issue in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a species in which social network analyses have evidenced nonrandom social associations between individuals. We measured the mutual preference in pairs of guppies that previously familiarized in groups of either 2 or 6 individuals. To estimate the equitability of social associations, we first tested the preference of one fish for a familiar stimulus fish over an unfamiliar stimulus fish, and then, we similarly tested the preference of the other fish. Irrespective of the group size experienced during familiarization (2 or 6 individuals), we found a within-pair consistency in the preference for the familiar fish, indicating that guppies developed social associations that are mutual between individuals. In a further condition, we tested pairs of unfamiliar individuals to assess the role of familiarity in equitable social associations. We found that equitable social associations did not develop in absence of previous familiarization and were not based on spontaneous preferences or phenotypic assortment. Our results demonstrate that familiarity mediates the development of equitable social associations in guppies and suggest that this behavior may be more widespread than previously considered.

Familiarity mediates equitable social associations in guppies

Lucon-Xiccato, Tyrone
Secondo
;
Pilastro, Andrea
Penultimo
;
Griggio, Matteo
Ultimo
2019

Abstract

Several fish species are characterized by social systems in which individuals prefer to interact with specific group mates. However, there is no clear evidence that such associations are equitable, that is, they are mutual between individuals. We addressed this issue in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a species in which social network analyses have evidenced nonrandom social associations between individuals. We measured the mutual preference in pairs of guppies that previously familiarized in groups of either 2 or 6 individuals. To estimate the equitability of social associations, we first tested the preference of one fish for a familiar stimulus fish over an unfamiliar stimulus fish, and then, we similarly tested the preference of the other fish. Irrespective of the group size experienced during familiarization (2 or 6 individuals), we found a within-pair consistency in the preference for the familiar fish, indicating that guppies developed social associations that are mutual between individuals. In a further condition, we tested pairs of unfamiliar individuals to assess the role of familiarity in equitable social associations. We found that equitable social associations did not develop in absence of previous familiarization and were not based on spontaneous preferences or phenotypic assortment. Our results demonstrate that familiarity mediates the development of equitable social associations in guppies and suggest that this behavior may be more widespread than previously considered.
2019
Cattelan, Silvia; Lucon-Xiccato, Tyrone; Pilastro, Andrea; Griggio, Matteo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ary135.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 461.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
461.81 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Preprint11392_2403668.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: versione preprint
Tipologia: Pre-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 371.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
371.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2403668
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact