Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effects of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) in patients at low mobility with leg edema. Methods: A pilot, two-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial was performed. Fifty patients (age, 58.4 ± 9 years; male, 14), randomly allocated to a group (IPC) undergoing 1 month (n = 29) of an in-home cycle of IPC and to a control (C) group (n = 21), were studied. Leg edema was evaluated by measuring subcutaneous thickness (high-resolution ultrasound) and circumferences (metric tape), both assessed at different levels of the lower limbs, and volume (water plethysmography). Ankle range of motion (ROM, goniometer), quality of life (QoL) by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and a pool of plasma inflammatory markers were also evaluated. Results: Edema significantly decreased in the IPC group (for all outcome measures, P <.0001), whereas it significantly increased in the C group (P <.0001). Ankle ROM was significantly enhanced in the IPC group (dorsiflexion, P <.0001; plantar flexion, P =.002) and remained stable in the C group. QoL showed an improvement in the IPC group, particularly significant for the general health subscale (P =.004), whereas no changes were highlighted in the C group. The two groups exhibited different trends and variations for some plasma inflammatory markers, mainly for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Conclusions: In a sample of patients at reduced mobility with leg edema, IPC treatment was effective in reducing the edema, improving the ankle ROM, and determining a positive impact on QoL together with a slight modulation of some plasma inflammatory markers.

Effects of intermittent pneumatic compression treatment on clinical outcomes and biochemical markers in patients at low mobility with lower limb edema

Mirko Tessari
Primo
;
Veronica Tisato
Secondo
;
Erika Rimondi;Paolo Zamboni
Penultimo
;
Anna Maria Malagoni
Ultimo
2018

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effects of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) in patients at low mobility with leg edema. Methods: A pilot, two-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial was performed. Fifty patients (age, 58.4 ± 9 years; male, 14), randomly allocated to a group (IPC) undergoing 1 month (n = 29) of an in-home cycle of IPC and to a control (C) group (n = 21), were studied. Leg edema was evaluated by measuring subcutaneous thickness (high-resolution ultrasound) and circumferences (metric tape), both assessed at different levels of the lower limbs, and volume (water plethysmography). Ankle range of motion (ROM, goniometer), quality of life (QoL) by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and a pool of plasma inflammatory markers were also evaluated. Results: Edema significantly decreased in the IPC group (for all outcome measures, P <.0001), whereas it significantly increased in the C group (P <.0001). Ankle ROM was significantly enhanced in the IPC group (dorsiflexion, P <.0001; plantar flexion, P =.002) and remained stable in the C group. QoL showed an improvement in the IPC group, particularly significant for the general health subscale (P =.004), whereas no changes were highlighted in the C group. The two groups exhibited different trends and variations for some plasma inflammatory markers, mainly for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Conclusions: In a sample of patients at reduced mobility with leg edema, IPC treatment was effective in reducing the edema, improving the ankle ROM, and determining a positive impact on QoL together with a slight modulation of some plasma inflammatory markers.
2018
Tessari, Mirko; Tisato, Veronica; Rimondi, Erika; Zamboni, Paolo; Malagoni, Anna Maria
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tessari et al 2018 PDF.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.06 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2394374
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact