Bone retouchers are common in Middle and Upper Palaeolithic contexts. In northern Italy, these tools are abundant in final Mousterian sites. In order to pinpoint the possible cultural similarities or differences in the use of these artefacts, the present study analyses the bone retouchers of two nearby sites: Fumane and de Nadale caves. Fumane cave is a large cavity where various techno-complexes have been identified. For the purposes of this research, we analysed more than 300 pieces from the Discoid, Levallois, Uluzzian and Proto-Aurignacian layers. De Nadale cave is a single occupation site attributed to the Quina Mousterian. This site, although still under excavation, includes a high number of bone retouchers – about 200 elements have so far been identified. These elements were subjected to a multidisciplinary study, dealing with their archaeozoological, taphonomic, technological and functional characteristics. The faunal remains on which the retouch stigmata occur are similar, especially throughout the whole of the Fumane sequence, although the general faunal spectrum changes over time. Similarities are also found in the anatomical portions used as retouchers in the different techno-complexes under review. From a functional standpoint, the differences are more obvious. The intensity of use varies diachronically, as the number of identified stigmata changes from one techno-complex to the next. This contribution offers a wide overview of the cultural differences and similarities of this little elaborated tool from a chronological standpoint.

Same but different: 20,000 years of bone retouchers from Northern Italy. A diachronologic approach from Neanderthals to Anatomically Modern Humans

Jéquier C.
Primo
Formal Analysis
;
Peresani M.
Supervision
;
Livraghi A.
Data Curation
;
Romandini M.
Ultimo
Data Curation
2018

Abstract

Bone retouchers are common in Middle and Upper Palaeolithic contexts. In northern Italy, these tools are abundant in final Mousterian sites. In order to pinpoint the possible cultural similarities or differences in the use of these artefacts, the present study analyses the bone retouchers of two nearby sites: Fumane and de Nadale caves. Fumane cave is a large cavity where various techno-complexes have been identified. For the purposes of this research, we analysed more than 300 pieces from the Discoid, Levallois, Uluzzian and Proto-Aurignacian layers. De Nadale cave is a single occupation site attributed to the Quina Mousterian. This site, although still under excavation, includes a high number of bone retouchers – about 200 elements have so far been identified. These elements were subjected to a multidisciplinary study, dealing with their archaeozoological, taphonomic, technological and functional characteristics. The faunal remains on which the retouch stigmata occur are similar, especially throughout the whole of the Fumane sequence, although the general faunal spectrum changes over time. Similarities are also found in the anatomical portions used as retouchers in the different techno-complexes under review. From a functional standpoint, the differences are more obvious. The intensity of use varies diachronically, as the number of identified stigmata changes from one techno-complex to the next. This contribution offers a wide overview of the cultural differences and similarities of this little elaborated tool from a chronological standpoint.
2018
978-3-88467-305-8
Retouchers, Middle and Upper Palaeolithic, Northern Italy, Bone technology
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
13_BoneToolTechn_Jequier_etal.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 5.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.46 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2392109
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact