BACKGROUND: Role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer is unclear. Our objective is to assess the role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. METHODS: The study reviewed retrospectively 829 cases of endometrial cancer from a single non-oncological center from 1981 to 2014. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed. Independent variables were: 2009 FIGO stage, histological type of endometrial cancer (non-endometrioid, endometrioid, grading 1, 2 and 3), radicality on parametria, lymphatic dissection (any kind) (yes/no), any kind of chemotherapy, any kind of radiotherapy, brachytherapy, patients' age. Dependent variable was death for endometrial cancer and first relapse. Time variable was the semester of follow-up. P value for significance was set <0.05. RESULTS: Many data about the extension of node dissection were missing. Pelvic node dissection or sampling seem the more common procedure performed. At the 10-semester of follow-up, at the 20-semester of follow-up and at the 30 semester of follow up, lymphadenectomy does not improve overall survival at a p value of less than 0.05. Lymphadenectomy reduces the risk of relapse at the 10 semester and 20-semester of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphadenectomy plays a role in preventing relapses but it is not proved that non-aggressive lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer improves overall survival at p level of 0.05. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that a very small improvement in long lasting survival in few cases of endometrial cancer could be due to node dissections.

Outcome of endometrial cancer after lymphadenectomy: A single center retrospective analysis with long-lasting follow-up

GRECO, Pantaleo;MARTINELLO, Ruby;BORGHI, Chiara;BONACCORSI, Gloria;SCUTIERO, GENNARO
2017

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer is unclear. Our objective is to assess the role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. METHODS: The study reviewed retrospectively 829 cases of endometrial cancer from a single non-oncological center from 1981 to 2014. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed. Independent variables were: 2009 FIGO stage, histological type of endometrial cancer (non-endometrioid, endometrioid, grading 1, 2 and 3), radicality on parametria, lymphatic dissection (any kind) (yes/no), any kind of chemotherapy, any kind of radiotherapy, brachytherapy, patients' age. Dependent variable was death for endometrial cancer and first relapse. Time variable was the semester of follow-up. P value for significance was set <0.05. RESULTS: Many data about the extension of node dissection were missing. Pelvic node dissection or sampling seem the more common procedure performed. At the 10-semester of follow-up, at the 20-semester of follow-up and at the 30 semester of follow up, lymphadenectomy does not improve overall survival at a p value of less than 0.05. Lymphadenectomy reduces the risk of relapse at the 10 semester and 20-semester of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphadenectomy plays a role in preventing relapses but it is not proved that non-aggressive lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer improves overall survival at p level of 0.05. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that a very small improvement in long lasting survival in few cases of endometrial cancer could be due to node dissections.
Greco, Pantaleo; Martinello, Ruby; Indraccolo, Ugo; Borghi, Chiara; Bonaccorsi, Gloria; Scutiero, Gennaro
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2369741
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact