Purpose This research enlarges the debate on the operations management strategies pursued by manufacturing companies. It focuses on issues concerning servitisation and customisation, enterprise resource planning (ERP) and Lean agile, supply chain orchestration, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and Lean for design management. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire of eight questions which stemmed from a literature review was completed by 152 senior operations managers from 120 large European manufacturing companies. Responses were scaled from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The results were tested for reliability using Cronbach’s alpha test. The questions were tested through a one-sample t test. Findings The 152 respondents consider servitisation and standardisation to be a trade-off. They consider integration of ERP strategies with Lean and agile systems and customised products/processes to be difficult. Furthermore, suppliers’ orchestration is considered not that suitable for manufacturing companies and suppliers’ CSR performance measurement excessive. By contrast, a CSR internal performance measurement is helpful for increasing sales. The respondents also indicate that there is a lack of Lean tools for design and development processes and Six Sigma is the only strategy for improving quality performance in design and development processes. Research limitations/implications The findings are applicable only to the manufacturing sector. The findings of this research indicate many avenues of research for scholars. Practical implications The findings can be very useful for manufacturing operations managers deciding their future strategies on operations. Originality/value Findings related to servitisation and customisation, ERP and Lean agile, supply orchestration for manufacturing companies and Lean and agile for product design are original and open a valuable debate.
Data di pubblicazione: | 2017 | |
Titolo: | Strategies for modern operations management: answers from European manufacturing companies | |
Autori: | Chiarini, A; Vagnoni, Emidia | |
Rivista: | BENCHMARKING | |
Keywords: | Corporate social responsibility, ERP, Design management, Servitization, Lean-agile, supply-orchestration | |
Abstract in inglese: | Purpose This research enlarges the debate on the operations management strategies pursued by manufacturing companies. It focuses on issues concerning servitisation and customisation, enterprise resource planning (ERP) and Lean agile, supply chain orchestration, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and Lean for design management. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire of eight questions which stemmed from a literature review was completed by 152 senior operations managers from 120 large European manufacturing companies. Responses were scaled from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The results were tested for reliability using Cronbach’s alpha test. The questions were tested through a one-sample t test. Findings The 152 respondents consider servitisation and standardisation to be a trade-off. They consider integration of ERP strategies with Lean and agile systems and customised products/processes to be difficult. Furthermore, suppliers’ orchestration is considered not that suitable for manufacturing companies and suppliers’ CSR performance measurement excessive. By contrast, a CSR internal performance measurement is helpful for increasing sales. The respondents also indicate that there is a lack of Lean tools for design and development processes and Six Sigma is the only strategy for improving quality performance in design and development processes. Research limitations/implications The findings are applicable only to the manufacturing sector. The findings of this research indicate many avenues of research for scholars. Practical implications The findings can be very useful for manufacturing operations managers deciding their future strategies on operations. Originality/value Findings related to servitisation and customisation, ERP and Lean agile, supply orchestration for manufacturing companies and Lean and agile for product design are original and open a valuable debate. | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | 10.1108/BIJ-11-2015-0115 | |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11392/2368408 | |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 03.1 Articolo su rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bechmarking-2017-Strategies.pdf | benchmarking-2017 | Full text (versione editoriale) | NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto | Administrator Richiedi una copia |