This article underlines the suitability of a differentiated approach to criminal negligence. In doing so, the author draws heavily on legal literature advocating the practical and theoretical development of models of criminal liability based on the different contexts of risk and liability. Within this framework, particular emphasis is placed on the field of labour law, a true "laboratory" of experimentation and study, in the context of which numerous patterns of criminal negligence can be observed. In light of this "multiplicity", the discussion of the unintentional model of criminal liability requires us to take issue with the presumed "completeness" of the unitary approach, which appears to be deficient in both cognitive and descriptive purposes. To summarize, instead of speaking of negligence we should speak of negligences. This article, therefore, sets out to shed light on the various patterns of criminal negligence in the field of labour health and security law, by critically evaluating how they affect, in terms of “distortion”, the proper implementation of the legal criteria ascribing subjective criminal liability.
Il contributo approfondisce in maniera innovativa e con rigore teorico la estrema frammentazione della nozione di colpa alla luce del sottosistema di responsabilità in materia di sicurezza del lavoro. Un ulteriore tassello conoscitivo nell'ambito della difficile e controversa categoria della colpa penale.
Fenomenologie della colpa in ambito lavorativo. Un catalogo ragionato
CASTRONUOVO, Donato
2016
Abstract
This article underlines the suitability of a differentiated approach to criminal negligence. In doing so, the author draws heavily on legal literature advocating the practical and theoretical development of models of criminal liability based on the different contexts of risk and liability. Within this framework, particular emphasis is placed on the field of labour law, a true "laboratory" of experimentation and study, in the context of which numerous patterns of criminal negligence can be observed. In light of this "multiplicity", the discussion of the unintentional model of criminal liability requires us to take issue with the presumed "completeness" of the unitary approach, which appears to be deficient in both cognitive and descriptive purposes. To summarize, instead of speaking of negligence we should speak of negligences. This article, therefore, sets out to shed light on the various patterns of criminal negligence in the field of labour health and security law, by critically evaluating how they affect, in terms of “distortion”, the proper implementation of the legal criteria ascribing subjective criminal liability.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CASTRONUOVO.2361925.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
520.83 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
520.83 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.