Anderson (2013) referred to various aspects of permutation p-values. We agree with most of the notions and ideas heuristically discussed there; however, we present a more formal discussion to confirm and be more precise. The approach adopted in Pesarin (2001), Pesarin (2013) and Pesarin & Salmaso (2010a, 2010b) considered permutation tests in light of the conditionality and sufficiency principles of inference, and we borrow freely from those citations.

A response to anderson's (2013) conceptual distinction between the critical p value and type I error rate in permutation testing

PESARIN, Fortunato;BONNINI, Stefano
2013

Abstract

Anderson (2013) referred to various aspects of permutation p-values. We agree with most of the notions and ideas heuristically discussed there; however, we present a more formal discussion to confirm and be more precise. The approach adopted in Pesarin (2001), Pesarin (2013) and Pesarin & Salmaso (2010a, 2010b) considered permutation tests in light of the conditionality and sufficiency principles of inference, and we borrow freely from those citations.
Pesarin, Fortunato; Bonnini, Stefano
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2185213
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact