Anderson (2013) referred to various aspects of permutation p-values. We agree with most of the notions and ideas heuristically discussed there; however, we present a more formal discussion to confirm and be more precise. The approach adopted in Pesarin (2001), Pesarin (2013) and Pesarin & Salmaso (2010a, 2010b) considered permutation tests in light of the conditionality and sufficiency principles of inference, and we borrow freely from those citations.
Scheda prodotto non validato
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Titolo: | A response to anderson's (2013) conceptual distinction between the critical p value and type I error rate in permutation testing |
Autori: | |
Data di pubblicazione: | 2013 |
Rivista: | |
Abstract: | Anderson (2013) referred to various aspects of permutation p-values. We agree with most of the notions and ideas heuristically discussed there; however, we present a more formal discussion to confirm and be more precise. The approach adopted in Pesarin (2001), Pesarin (2013) and Pesarin & Salmaso (2010a, 2010b) considered permutation tests in light of the conditionality and sufficiency principles of inference, and we borrow freely from those citations. |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11392/2185213 |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 03.1 Articolo su rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.