To examine the clinical effect of repetitive focal muscle vibration (rMV) on the motor function of the upper extremity 1 month after treatment in patients with chronic stroke. We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial using a double-blind, parallel-group study design. Medical center. Patients with chronic stroke (N=49). Patients randomly assigned to the study group (SG) received rMV, while patients in the control group (CG) received a placebo vibratory treatment. The patients and the clinical examiner were blind to the intervention. The primary endpoint was an improvement of more than .37 points on the Functional Ability Scale of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT FAS). The Modified Ashworth Scale and the visual analog scale were the secondary outcome measures. All measures were administered before the treatment (t0) and 1 week (t1) and 1 month (t2) after the treatment. Twenty-eight patients were allocated to the SG and 21 to the CG. The analysis of variance for repeated measurements revealed a significant difference in the expression of the WMFT FAS score over time only in the SG (P=.006). The treatment was successful for 7 (33%) of 21 patients recruited in the SG and for 2 (13%) of 15 patients recruited in the CG. The relative risk was 2.5 (95% confidence interval, .6010.39), and the number needed to treat was 5. The Wilcoxon test showed a statistically significant difference between t0 and t2 in the SG (P=.02). No adverse event was observed in the 2 groups. Our results suggest that rMV treatment of the upper limb may improve the functional ability of chronic stroke patients, but a larger, multicenter, randomized controlled study is needed. © 2012 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Focal Muscle Vibration in the Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients With Chronic Stroke

CALIANDRO, Pietro;GRANIERI, Enrico Gavino Giuseppe;
2012

Abstract

To examine the clinical effect of repetitive focal muscle vibration (rMV) on the motor function of the upper extremity 1 month after treatment in patients with chronic stroke. We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial using a double-blind, parallel-group study design. Medical center. Patients with chronic stroke (N=49). Patients randomly assigned to the study group (SG) received rMV, while patients in the control group (CG) received a placebo vibratory treatment. The patients and the clinical examiner were blind to the intervention. The primary endpoint was an improvement of more than .37 points on the Functional Ability Scale of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT FAS). The Modified Ashworth Scale and the visual analog scale were the secondary outcome measures. All measures were administered before the treatment (t0) and 1 week (t1) and 1 month (t2) after the treatment. Twenty-eight patients were allocated to the SG and 21 to the CG. The analysis of variance for repeated measurements revealed a significant difference in the expression of the WMFT FAS score over time only in the SG (P=.006). The treatment was successful for 7 (33%) of 21 patients recruited in the SG and for 2 (13%) of 15 patients recruited in the CG. The relative risk was 2.5 (95% confidence interval, .6010.39), and the number needed to treat was 5. The Wilcoxon test showed a statistically significant difference between t0 and t2 in the SG (P=.02). No adverse event was observed in the 2 groups. Our results suggest that rMV treatment of the upper limb may improve the functional ability of chronic stroke patients, but a larger, multicenter, randomized controlled study is needed. © 2012 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
2012
Caliandro, Pietro; Celletti, C; Padua, L; Minciotti, I; Russo, G; Granata, G; La Torre, G; Granieri, Enrico Gavino Giuseppe; Camerota, F.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/1672878
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 78
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 63
social impact