In 1792, the Aenesidemus played a fundamental role in the Post-Kantian debate. During the following forty years, its author Ernst Gottlob Schulze clarified his own philosophical position in the psychological debate of his era upholding the position of a ‘natural realism’ on a psycho-anthropological basis. Nonetheless the results of his gnoseology presented in Psychische Anthropologie (1816) exceeded the limits of a theory of knowledge, culminating in a theological proposal deemed as ‘anthropotheology’ presented in Über die menschliche Erkenntniß (1832). This article re-trace the steps which led Schulze to this position, referring particularly to his analysis of the structure of consciousness.
Ernst Gottlob Schulze oltre Enesidemo. L'antropologia psichica e i suoi risvolti teologici
D'ALFONSO, Matteo Vincenzo
2008
Abstract
In 1792, the Aenesidemus played a fundamental role in the Post-Kantian debate. During the following forty years, its author Ernst Gottlob Schulze clarified his own philosophical position in the psychological debate of his era upholding the position of a ‘natural realism’ on a psycho-anthropological basis. Nonetheless the results of his gnoseology presented in Psychische Anthropologie (1816) exceeded the limits of a theory of knowledge, culminating in a theological proposal deemed as ‘anthropotheology’ presented in Über die menschliche Erkenntniß (1832). This article re-trace the steps which led Schulze to this position, referring particularly to his analysis of the structure of consciousness.I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
