Women have about twice the risk of developing multiple sclerosis compared with men, a ratio that seems to be increasing. Most studies show that female patients seem to have a more favourable outcome of the disease. We studied the gender-specific impact of multiple sclerosis on health-related quality of life.We surveyed the population prevalence of multiple sclerosis patients in Ferrara, Italy. Data were extracted from the multiple sclerosis registry of the study area. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the MSQOL54 questionnaire. We analysed 370 patients (105 men and 265 women). They had worse scores than the general population in all health-related quality of life dimensions, ranging from 2.5 standard deviations (SD) lower for physical functioning to less than 0.5 standard deviations for mental health. Health-related quality of life scores were inversely correlated with disability scores. The impact of disability on healthrelated quality of life was higher for men than women regarding physical functioning (p<0.01), vitality (p<0.001), social functioning (p<0.001), emotional well-being (p<0.05) and mental health (p<0.01). For scales reflecting mental health, a marked reduction with increasing disability was seen for men, while a linear reduction in the range of Expanded Disability Status Scale score 0–5 was reported for women, followed by no clear decrease for higher scores.We conclude that multiple sclerosis affects health-related quality of life in all of its dimensions. The impact of disability seems to be stronger among men, in particular for scales related to mental well-being. This could indicate that interventions should be gender specific in order to better meet patients’ needs.

Gender differences in health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis

CASETTA, Ilaria;RIISE, Trond;DE GENNARO, Riccardo;FAZIO, Patrik;CESNIK, Edward;GOVONI, Vittorio;GRANIERI, Enrico Gavino Giuseppe
2009

Abstract

Women have about twice the risk of developing multiple sclerosis compared with men, a ratio that seems to be increasing. Most studies show that female patients seem to have a more favourable outcome of the disease. We studied the gender-specific impact of multiple sclerosis on health-related quality of life.We surveyed the population prevalence of multiple sclerosis patients in Ferrara, Italy. Data were extracted from the multiple sclerosis registry of the study area. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the MSQOL54 questionnaire. We analysed 370 patients (105 men and 265 women). They had worse scores than the general population in all health-related quality of life dimensions, ranging from 2.5 standard deviations (SD) lower for physical functioning to less than 0.5 standard deviations for mental health. Health-related quality of life scores were inversely correlated with disability scores. The impact of disability on healthrelated quality of life was higher for men than women regarding physical functioning (p<0.01), vitality (p<0.001), social functioning (p<0.001), emotional well-being (p<0.05) and mental health (p<0.01). For scales reflecting mental health, a marked reduction with increasing disability was seen for men, while a linear reduction in the range of Expanded Disability Status Scale score 0–5 was reported for women, followed by no clear decrease for higher scores.We conclude that multiple sclerosis affects health-related quality of life in all of its dimensions. The impact of disability seems to be stronger among men, in particular for scales related to mental well-being. This could indicate that interventions should be gender specific in order to better meet patients’ needs.
2009
Casetta, Ilaria; Riise, Trond; M. W., Nortvedt; N. T., Economou; DE GENNARO, Riccardo; Fazio, Patrik; Cesnik, Edward; Govoni, Vittorio; Granieri, Enrico Gavino Giuseppe
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/1378134
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 63
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact