In fifteen awake, chronic cats single-unit recordings were obtained from 316 fibres isolated in the rostral portion of the corpus callosum (CC). Altogether, 304 units were reactive to peripheral stimuli. They were fired by hair bending, light touch or light pressure (S units; 79.3%) or by gentle rotation of joints and/or by pressure on muscle bellies or tendons (D units; 20.7%). All the reactive units were endowed with small and unilateral receptive fields (RFs) located in trigeminal (49.7%) or segmental (50.3%) regions. Trigeminal and forepaw units had the smallest RFs. All the trigeminal units were of the S type. Their RFs were located in either the ophthalmic, maxillar, and mandibular face districts or in the oral vestible. The vast majority of segmental units (146 out 153 fibres) had RFs in the forelimb. Very few units were fired by stimulation of the trunk (6 fibres), and only one had its RF in the tail. Almost half of the forelimb units (69 fibres) were fired by stimulation of the most proximal parts of the forelimb and of the shoulder; about one third (57 fibres) exhibited RFs located in the forepaw; the remaining units (20 fibres) had their RFs in the intermediate region of the forelimb. Neither the trigeminal nor segmental RFs ever extended across the midline. The distribution of the fibres within the CC conformed to a somatotopic pattern. The representations of the trigeminal and segmental regions were largely coextensive. Along the rostro-caudal axis of the CC, units with RFs in the mandibular, maxillar and ophthalmic divisions of the trigeminal region tended to lie in this order in the rostralmost 4 mm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Somatic receptive-field propeties of single fibres in the rostral portion of the corpus callosum in awake cats.

SPIDALIERI, Giuseppe;FRANCHI, Gianfranco;GUANDALINI, Paola
1985

Abstract

In fifteen awake, chronic cats single-unit recordings were obtained from 316 fibres isolated in the rostral portion of the corpus callosum (CC). Altogether, 304 units were reactive to peripheral stimuli. They were fired by hair bending, light touch or light pressure (S units; 79.3%) or by gentle rotation of joints and/or by pressure on muscle bellies or tendons (D units; 20.7%). All the reactive units were endowed with small and unilateral receptive fields (RFs) located in trigeminal (49.7%) or segmental (50.3%) regions. Trigeminal and forepaw units had the smallest RFs. All the trigeminal units were of the S type. Their RFs were located in either the ophthalmic, maxillar, and mandibular face districts or in the oral vestible. The vast majority of segmental units (146 out 153 fibres) had RFs in the forelimb. Very few units were fired by stimulation of the trunk (6 fibres), and only one had its RF in the tail. Almost half of the forelimb units (69 fibres) were fired by stimulation of the most proximal parts of the forelimb and of the shoulder; about one third (57 fibres) exhibited RFs located in the forepaw; the remaining units (20 fibres) had their RFs in the intermediate region of the forelimb. Neither the trigeminal nor segmental RFs ever extended across the midline. The distribution of the fibres within the CC conformed to a somatotopic pattern. The representations of the trigeminal and segmental regions were largely coextensive. Along the rostro-caudal axis of the CC, units with RFs in the mandibular, maxillar and ophthalmic divisions of the trigeminal region tended to lie in this order in the rostralmost 4 mm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
1985
Spidalieri, Giuseppe; Franchi, Gianfranco; Guandalini, Paola
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/461480
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact