When two food patches are available, individuals of many animal species feed on the larger one, a preference frequently used to study numerical abilities in mammals and birds. We employed this method to investigate, for the first time, food quantity discrimination and its underlying mechanisms in a fish, the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Guppies facing two sets of similar-sized food items successfully discriminated numerosity up to a 0.5 ratio (one versus four and two versus four items, but not two versus three or three versus four food items). A further experiment suggested that guppies attended to cumulative surface area of food items rather than number to select the larger quantity. Moreover, in a two versus four discrimination in which the cumulative surface area occupied by food was matched by using larger items in the set with fewer items, guppies unexpectedly showed a preference for the smaller numerosity. Since this result might be explained by assuming that guppies selected the larger food item, we performed additional experiments to test this hypothesis. Guppies were observed to be very accurate in estimating item size, being able to discriminate between two food items that differed by a ratio of 0.75 in surface area. The attraction to the larger food item was so strong that guppies preferred the set containing the largest item even when the other set contained a double quantity of food. Since guppies in the wild forage in groups and compete for food, we hypothesized that in this species natural selection has favoured cognitive mechanisms allowing a rapid and efficient choice of the most profitable food item within the patch.

Guppies discriminate between two quantities of food items but prioritize item size over total amount

Lucon-Xiccato, Tyrone
Primo
;
2015

Abstract

When two food patches are available, individuals of many animal species feed on the larger one, a preference frequently used to study numerical abilities in mammals and birds. We employed this method to investigate, for the first time, food quantity discrimination and its underlying mechanisms in a fish, the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Guppies facing two sets of similar-sized food items successfully discriminated numerosity up to a 0.5 ratio (one versus four and two versus four items, but not two versus three or three versus four food items). A further experiment suggested that guppies attended to cumulative surface area of food items rather than number to select the larger quantity. Moreover, in a two versus four discrimination in which the cumulative surface area occupied by food was matched by using larger items in the set with fewer items, guppies unexpectedly showed a preference for the smaller numerosity. Since this result might be explained by assuming that guppies selected the larger food item, we performed additional experiments to test this hypothesis. Guppies were observed to be very accurate in estimating item size, being able to discriminate between two food items that differed by a ratio of 0.75 in surface area. The attraction to the larger food item was so strong that guppies preferred the set containing the largest item even when the other set contained a double quantity of food. Since guppies in the wild forage in groups and compete for food, we hypothesized that in this species natural selection has favoured cognitive mechanisms allowing a rapid and efficient choice of the most profitable food item within the patch.
2015
Lucon-Xiccato, Tyrone; Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena; Agrillo, Christian; Bisazza, Angelo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0003347215002365-main.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 536.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
536.17 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Postprint11392_2381464.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: post print
Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 466.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
466.76 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2381464
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 75
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 74
social impact