Objective. The aim of the analysis is to assess the impact of privately employed Migrant Care Workers (MCWs) on the burden of Italian family members who are caring for a disabled older person. Methods. EUROFAMCARE is a one-year prospective survey carried out to provide evidence on the availability and use of support services by family carers of older people in Europe. In Italy, 990 family caregivers were enrolled and successful follow-ups were completed for 863 subjects. The survey assessed also the level of caregiver burden using the COPE index, which has three sub-sections: “Positive Value”(-PV), “Quality of Support”(-QS) and “Negative Impact”(-NI). We used the one-year change of the COPE-NI as dependent variable and we realised multilevel regression models to estimate the longitudinal predictors of caregivers’ burden increase. Results. At cross-sectional level, the most burdened caregivers are those caring for a demented relative (COPE-NI=13.6), with no educational title (14.5) and looking after their own spouses (15.1). Longitudinally those employing a MCW are significantly protected against burden increase (regression coefficient:-1.52;p<0.01) while those who cannot rely on the support of other family members are exposed to the risk of burden increase (0.991;p<0.05).Other formal services do not have any protective effect. Conclusion. Our study suggests that employing a MCW, rather than using formal services, is associated with a reduction of caregiving burden. Further research should assess whether the shift in care responsibilities to MCWs implies also a transfer of care burden, and understand how these workers can be better supported by existing formal services.

Migrant care workers as protective factor against caregiver burden: results from a longitudinal analysis of the EUROFAMCARE study in Italy

Manzoli L;
2013

Abstract

Objective. The aim of the analysis is to assess the impact of privately employed Migrant Care Workers (MCWs) on the burden of Italian family members who are caring for a disabled older person. Methods. EUROFAMCARE is a one-year prospective survey carried out to provide evidence on the availability and use of support services by family carers of older people in Europe. In Italy, 990 family caregivers were enrolled and successful follow-ups were completed for 863 subjects. The survey assessed also the level of caregiver burden using the COPE index, which has three sub-sections: “Positive Value”(-PV), “Quality of Support”(-QS) and “Negative Impact”(-NI). We used the one-year change of the COPE-NI as dependent variable and we realised multilevel regression models to estimate the longitudinal predictors of caregivers’ burden increase. Results. At cross-sectional level, the most burdened caregivers are those caring for a demented relative (COPE-NI=13.6), with no educational title (14.5) and looking after their own spouses (15.1). Longitudinally those employing a MCW are significantly protected against burden increase (regression coefficient:-1.52;p<0.01) while those who cannot rely on the support of other family members are exposed to the risk of burden increase (0.991;p<0.05).Other formal services do not have any protective effect. Conclusion. Our study suggests that employing a MCW, rather than using formal services, is associated with a reduction of caregiving burden. Further research should assess whether the shift in care responsibilities to MCWs implies also a transfer of care burden, and understand how these workers can be better supported by existing formal services.
2013
Chiatti, C; Di Rosa, M; Melchiorre, G; Manzoli, L; Lamura, G; Rimland, Jm
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2361155
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact