Purpose: The era of austerity that has followed the outbreak of the global financial crisis has posed a myriad of challenges for public services, with demands for major cuts in government spending, the delivery of balanced budgets and strategies for deficit reduction. This paper considers how public sector accounting and accountability systems are implicated in the development and implementation of austerity policies. Also, it pinpoints a range of issues that accounting researchers need to be contemplating on the subject of accounting for austerity. Design/Methodology/approach: Interdisciplinary literature review, coupled with an illustrative discussion of the changing nature of public sector accounting practices under austerity. Findings: Despite the significance and scale of austerity, public sector accounting research on the topic is in its infancy, with the prominent focus being on how accounting technologies are used to manage austerity. There have been few attempts to debate critically the construction of austerity and to provide alternative accounts of austerity. Accounting for austerity, especially in terms of its implications and consequences, is far too complex and challenging to be categorized as simply seeking to 'balance the books’. Research implications: We need to be developing understanding of public sector accounting research under austerity across different organizational levels and contexts. Also, we should be framing our accounts of austerity in ways that respect and build on a sound understanding of the extensive available interdisciplinary research on this topic. Key research questions to address include: how is accounting shaping constructions of, and impressions, attitudes and behaviours towards, austerity and the status of governments and public service organizations? What do such patterns of development mean for the roles and contributions of public sector accountants under austerity? Are accounting systems destined to be used primarily as vehicles for cost-cutting, or can they be used as engines for growth and for thinking about public service responsibilities in more socially-inclusive forms? Originality: Accountings of austerity in the field of public sector accounting research have been worryingly limited. This paper and the papers in this special issue of AAAJ address such failings, revealing a range of critical implications and challenges of austerity policies for public sector accounting research.

Public Sector Accounting, Accountability and Austerity: More Than Balancing the Books?

BRACCI, Enrico
Primo
;
2015

Abstract

Purpose: The era of austerity that has followed the outbreak of the global financial crisis has posed a myriad of challenges for public services, with demands for major cuts in government spending, the delivery of balanced budgets and strategies for deficit reduction. This paper considers how public sector accounting and accountability systems are implicated in the development and implementation of austerity policies. Also, it pinpoints a range of issues that accounting researchers need to be contemplating on the subject of accounting for austerity. Design/Methodology/approach: Interdisciplinary literature review, coupled with an illustrative discussion of the changing nature of public sector accounting practices under austerity. Findings: Despite the significance and scale of austerity, public sector accounting research on the topic is in its infancy, with the prominent focus being on how accounting technologies are used to manage austerity. There have been few attempts to debate critically the construction of austerity and to provide alternative accounts of austerity. Accounting for austerity, especially in terms of its implications and consequences, is far too complex and challenging to be categorized as simply seeking to 'balance the books’. Research implications: We need to be developing understanding of public sector accounting research under austerity across different organizational levels and contexts. Also, we should be framing our accounts of austerity in ways that respect and build on a sound understanding of the extensive available interdisciplinary research on this topic. Key research questions to address include: how is accounting shaping constructions of, and impressions, attitudes and behaviours towards, austerity and the status of governments and public service organizations? What do such patterns of development mean for the roles and contributions of public sector accountants under austerity? Are accounting systems destined to be used primarily as vehicles for cost-cutting, or can they be used as engines for growth and for thinking about public service responsibilities in more socially-inclusive forms? Originality: Accountings of austerity in the field of public sector accounting research have been worryingly limited. This paper and the papers in this special issue of AAAJ address such failings, revealing a range of critical implications and challenges of austerity policies for public sector accounting research.
2015
Bracci, Enrico; Christopher, Humphrey; Jodie, Moll; Ileana, Steccolini
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
AAAJ-06-2015-2090.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Pre-print
Dimensione 630.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
630.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
AAAJ-06-2015-2090introductoryarticleSI.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 496.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
496.2 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
BRACCI 11392 2316616 POST (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Post print
Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 427.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
427.56 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2326878
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 131
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 115
social impact