We use high–quality, multi-band observations of Swift GRB120404A, from γ-ray to radio frequencies, together with the new hydrodynamics code of van Eerten et al. (2012) to test the standard synchrotron shock model. The evolution of the radio and optical afterglow, with its prominent optical rebrightening at trest 260–2600 s, is remarkably well modelled by a decelerating jet viewed close to the jet edge, combined with some early reenergization of the shock. We thus constrain both the geometry of the jet with half–opening and viewing angles of 23◦ and 21◦ respectively, circumburst density of n = 240 cm^-3, and the microphysics parameters of the fireball epsilon_B = 2.4 × 10^-4 and epsilon_e = 9.3 × 10^−2. The ability to self–consistently model the microphysics parameters and jet geometry in this way offers an alternative to trying to identify elusive canonical jet breaks at late times. The mismatch between the observed X–ray flux and the model is explained by the local rather than the global cooling approximation in the synchrotron radiation model, constraining the microphysics of particle acceleration taking place in a relativistic shock and, in turn, emphasising the need for a more realistic treatment of cooling in future developments of theoretical models. Finally, our interpretation of the optical peak as due to the passage of the forward shock synchrotron frequency highlights the importance of high quality ulti–band data to prevent some optical peaks from being erroneously attributed to the onset of fireball deceleration.
New constraints on GRB jet geometry and relativistic shock physics
GUIDORZI, Cristiano;
2014
Abstract
We use high–quality, multi-band observations of Swift GRB120404A, from γ-ray to radio frequencies, together with the new hydrodynamics code of van Eerten et al. (2012) to test the standard synchrotron shock model. The evolution of the radio and optical afterglow, with its prominent optical rebrightening at trest 260–2600 s, is remarkably well modelled by a decelerating jet viewed close to the jet edge, combined with some early reenergization of the shock. We thus constrain both the geometry of the jet with half–opening and viewing angles of 23◦ and 21◦ respectively, circumburst density of n = 240 cm^-3, and the microphysics parameters of the fireball epsilon_B = 2.4 × 10^-4 and epsilon_e = 9.3 × 10^−2. The ability to self–consistently model the microphysics parameters and jet geometry in this way offers an alternative to trying to identify elusive canonical jet breaks at late times. The mismatch between the observed X–ray flux and the model is explained by the local rather than the global cooling approximation in the synchrotron radiation model, constraining the microphysics of particle acceleration taking place in a relativistic shock and, in turn, emphasising the need for a more realistic treatment of cooling in future developments of theoretical models. Finally, our interpretation of the optical peak as due to the passage of the forward shock synchrotron frequency highlights the importance of high quality ulti–band data to prevent some optical peaks from being erroneously attributed to the onset of fireball deceleration.I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
