Routing protocols for Ad Hoc Networks are currently a hot research topic and when a lot of metrics are jointly considered, some non-trivial conclusions can be drawn. In this work, we make a comparison of Link State, AODV and DSR protocols for two different traffic classes, in a selected environment. The classic Dijkstra is also reported as comparison term. As performance metric, packet delivery fraction, throughput, average delay and energy are considered. We show that AODV and DSR perform well when the network load is moderate, while, if the traffic load is heavy, simple Link State outperforms the reactive protocols and becomes a good candidate to be used.

Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks

BERTOCCHI, Federico;BERGAMO, PIERPAOLO;MAZZINI, Gianluca;ZORZI, Michele
2003

Abstract

Routing protocols for Ad Hoc Networks are currently a hot research topic and when a lot of metrics are jointly considered, some non-trivial conclusions can be drawn. In this work, we make a comparison of Link State, AODV and DSR protocols for two different traffic classes, in a selected environment. The classic Dijkstra is also reported as comparison term. As performance metric, packet delivery fraction, throughput, average delay and energy are considered. We show that AODV and DSR perform well when the network load is moderate, while, if the traffic load is heavy, simple Link State outperforms the reactive protocols and becomes a good candidate to be used.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/1194643
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact